In this issue:
i)    Spirituality and greener pastures
ii)   Moses: Aaron's rod that budded (1/2) - C.E. Wigg
Spirituality and greener pastures
Jill Carattini
 
G. K. Chesterton once made the comment that men have always one of two things: either a complete and conscious philosophy or the unconscious acceptance of the broken pieces of some incomplete and shattered and often discredited philosophy.
 
Perhaps today Chesterton might add one more category: The conscious (or somewhat conscious) acceptance of many pieces of many philosophies. America, it seems, is the melting pot in more ways than one. A recent issue of Christianity Today notes the increasing popularity of "Heinz 57" style spirituality, where one is free to dabble in a variety of belief systems and philosophies.

Of course, in the mindful accepting we find today of many pieces of philosophies, completeness is not understood as Chesterton used the word complete—meaning sound philosophy. Any sense of completeness comes from the idea that by dabbling in a variety of belief systems, one can create a satisfying philosophy for their unique life and needs. It is a practical spirituality that is sought above all else.
 
And sought it is. Marketers are well aware that spiritually sells—from books, to exercise, to tea bags. Universities offer courses ranging from the "Psychology of Spirituality" to "Spirituality and Hip Hop"—and the masses are simply noting that spiritually is hip. However, the fascination with being spiritual, many are careful to note, is not an interest in being religious. Whereas spirituality is seen as liberating, religion is perceived as limiting—and we are a culture thoroughly suspicious of all limits.

This is interesting because, practically speaking, there are limits all around us, though human behavior from infancy to adulthood seems altogether focused on pushing all limits. And yet in removing the fences, which is what postmodernity seeks to do, have we discovered that the grass is really greener on the other side? Have we truly enabled ourselves to live better, fuller, more complete lives, or does it more often seem the contrary? Are we happy with our pieces of spirituality, our dabbling in many philosophies, or does it still seem that we are missing a piece? And if we were told tomorrow that we could only hold seven pieces, would we be happy with our seven or would we then want eight? This is a far cry from "practical" isn't it? As my colleague Stuart McAllister states, "The impracticality and inability to live life as prescribed by postmodern tenets and prophets is one of the strongest arguments against it."

Charles Wesley once described a spiritual experience that led him to faith in Jesus Christ and a life transformed by his amazing love. In his eighteenth-century hymn he described it like this:

Long my imprisoned spirit lay,
Fast bound in sin and nature's night,
Thine eye diffused the quickening ray,
I woke the dungeon flamed with light.
My chains fell off, my heart was free,
I rose went forth and followed Thee.

In his honest look at Christ, Charles Wesley saw an honest look at himself—a broken, imprisoned man desperately in need of a savior. I believe the spiritual hunger of our nation is real. The question is: how practically are we willing to look at what we truly need? In bowing before the one who emptied himself of all but love, we find what we seek, complete and coherent. Will you rise and follow?
--
(1) G.K. Chesterton, The Common Man, 173.
---
[Copyright(c) 2005 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. A Slice of Infinity is a ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.]

 
Moses: Aaron's rod that budded (1/2)
Charles E. Wigg
 
In Numbers chapter seventeen God silenced forever any remaining objections to His sovereign choice of Aaron and his family to serve Him in the office of priests. The remaining chiefs or princes of the different tribes were commanded by God through Moses to bring an almond rod, one for each tribe, and the name of its owner was to be written clearly on each. Those rods were to be laid up in the Holy of holies in the Tabernacle, where Moses only had free access. Even Aaron had access to that place on only one day in the year. (The great day of atonement). But Moses had the unique privilege of entering there, and of communing with God, whenever he felt the need. Aaron’s rod was to be placed in the midst of the bundle of the rods of the tribes, just to show that it was exposed to the very same influences as the others, there was no favouritism thus to be shown to him. These rods were a symbol both of dignity and authority, and when the owner died it was doubtless handed to his successor. Thus they would be old dead and dry, and probably had been cut off from the tree for many rears.
 
When the rods were taken out of the holy of holies the next morning, they were all just the same as when they had been placed there, with the exception that Aaron’s rod had been transformed in many ways; it had come to life again, and not only had it been transformed but it was covered with fruit, and fruit in every stage from buds, blossoms, even right up to the final stage of bearing ripened almonds. I am told by those that know more than me, that though the almond is the first tree to bear in the spring time, it does not bear continually, but all the blossoms etc are at the same stage, thus the transformation of Aaron’s rod was more miraculous.
 
Resurrection:  The miracle of Aaron’s rod is a picture of resurrection. It is the resurrection of Christ that has singled Him out as God’s chosen High Priest. God testified to His approval of Christ, and His satisfaction with the work that He did on the cross, and the fact that Christ was His anointed, His chosen High Priest, and the One by whom He will yet judge the world; by raising Him from the dead. (Acts 17:31). This perhaps explains why the doctrine of the physical resurrection of Christ is the most hotly challenged doctrine of the scriptures, yet it is one of the most strongly attested facts in existence today. It is denied by Muslims, by Hindus, by Buddhists, by the cults, (Jehovah’s witnesses etc), and by nominal Christians and orthodox Jews etc, to name but a few. Thus we have the meaning of this miracle. Aaron was a type of Christ, and though Christ’s High Priesthood is after the Aaronic pattern, yet He is Priest forever after the order of Melchizedek, because the scriptures bear testimony of Christ that he lives, and Christ lives in the power of an endless life, and He ever lives to make intercession for us. (Hebrews:7)
 
A Rod Of An Almond Tree:  The Almond tree is the first to give buds and blossoms at the end of winter. It is the first to awaken from the long night of winter, and in thus is a symbol of resurrection, (life from the dead), Its blossoms are of the purest white, a symbol of the pure and holy, and the sinless nature of Christ, and also of the sinless nature of His work in the saints who share His resurrection, Christ being the first fruits. . It is also a symbol of the pure and holy nature .of the eternal promises that God has made to us in Christ, all of which are yea and amen in Christ in His resurrection. He is the “Faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God”. Christ is the “Firstborn from the dead, the Prince of the kings of the earth”. Blessed be His holy name!    [To be concluded] 
----
[Reproduced with permission of the Author]

 We respect and value your time and privacy.  If this newsletter no longer meets your needs, we will
be happy to remove you from our further mailing listTo be removed from the mailing list, please send
If this message is forwarded to you by a friend, please sign up for your own subscription by
sending a blank eMail to: brethrenvoice-subscribe@....
To receive a statement of our faith, send a blank eMail to: 
brethrenvoice-faq@...
To read <BrethrenVoice> on Blog, please click on the link: <BrethrenVoice>
BrethrenVoice Home    Brethren Christians Forum.  To GOD be the glory.