[brethrenvoice] 18 Oct 2002

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : October 2002 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Christian Efellowship" <efellowship@...>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 23:32:24 +0400

-------------------------<BrethrenVoice>-------------------------
[which seeks to be guided solely by the NT Biblical  pattern,
facilitates free flow of Christian info. To God be the glory!]
[eMail Moderator:  brethrenvoice-owner@...]
[<GLEANINGS-FOR-THE-DAY> Archives/Read online:
http://associate.com/digests/brethrenvoice/ezmlm.cgi]


<GLEANINGS-FOR-THE-DAY>
<18 October 2002>


In this issue:
----------------
(1)  <Devotional> "'Fact or fantasy?' Resurrection," (Pt-3/8)" - R.Zacharias
(2)  <Doctrinal> "Shall we meet our loved ones again?" (Pt-7/8) - D.L.Moody
(3)  <Doctrinal> "Three tenses of salvation" (Pt-2/3) - William MacDonald
(4)  <Prophetical> "The Redeemer's Return" (Pt-56)- A.W.Pink


(1)  <DEVOTIONAL> <SLICE-OF-INFINITY>
"'FACT OR FANTASY?'  RESURRECTION," (PART 3 OF 8)
Ravi Zacharias

Can a rational person believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the 
dead? We have considered what a noted philosopher has to say; what about a 
theologian?

Unfortunately, some theologians play by the same rules as the rest of the 
academy. Thus, Rudolf Bultmann, one of the most influential theologians of 
this century, rejected the resurrection at face value due to naturalistic 
assumptions. Commenting on this very dubious prejudice, Professor Jon 
MacQuarrie has said, "The one valid way in which we can ascertain whether a 
certain event took place or not is not by bringing in some sweeping 
assumption to show that it could not have taken place, but to consider the 
historical evidence available, and decide on that."

That is good advice: What does the historical evidence have to say? Well, 
the New Testament is easily the best attested ancient writing in terms of 
the sheer number of documents, the time span between the events recorded and 
the document, and the variety of documents available to sustain or 
contradict it. There is nothing in ancient manuscript evidence to match such 
textual availability and integrity. As the noted scholar Giza Vermes has 
said, "It should not be beyond the capabilities of an educated person to sit 
down and with a mind empty of prejudice read the [Gospels] as though for the 
first time."

When an honest reader considers the affirmations that are made and the 
substantiations provided, at least six deductions ensue. Let us look at the 
first three. The first is that Jesus Himself spoke of His resurrection on 
repeated occasions, and both his followers and his enemies were told to 
expect it. Indeed, those who sought to smother his teaching took elaborate 
steps to counter the possibility of His claim, including the placement of a 
Roman guard at the door to the tomb.

Second, although his supporters basically understood His promise to rise 
from the dead and had even witnessed his raising of Lazarus, they did not 
really believe that He meant it literally until after the fact. Therefore, 
they could not be accused of creating the scenario for this deception. 
Third, it was the post-resurrection appearances that made the ultimate 
difference to the skeptical mind of Thomas and the resistant will of Paul, 
and ultimately transformed the entire group of disciples.

We will consider more of the historical evidence before we come to our 
conclusion.  But what a thrilling truth this is. Please join me again, my 
friend, as we look even further.
---
Copyright (p)(c) 2001 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). 
Reprinted with permission. A Slice of Infinity is a radio ministry of Ravi 
Zacharias International Ministries.
_______________________________________________________________________

(2)   <DOCTRINAL>
SHALL WE MEET OUR LOVED ONES AGAIN? (PART-7 OF 8)
A STUDY OF 1 CORINTHIANS 15
D.L. Moody
....
"HOW ARE THE DEAD RAISED? AND WITH WHAT BODY DO THEY COME?"

Turning back to the chapter, we find that Paul next deals with the question 
of how the dead can be raised and with what body they come. He says, "Thou 
fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die: And that  
which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, 
it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain: But God" -- and all things 
are possible with God -- "giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to 
every seed  his own body. All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one 
kind of flesh of  men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and 
another of birds. There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: 
but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is 
another. There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and 
another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in 
glory."

"So also," continues Paul, "is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in 
corruption; it is raised in incorruption: It is sown in dishonour; it is 
raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: It is sown a 
natural  body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and 
there is a spiritual body. And so it is written, The first man Adam was made 
a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. Howbeit that was 
not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that 
which is spiritual The first man is of the earth, earthy. the second man is 
the Lord from heaven. As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: 
and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. And as we have 
borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. 
  " We see the truth of Paul's illustration in the world around us. The 
analogy of nature does not indeed furnish a proof of the resurrection, but 
it affords illustrations of many things that are just as hard to explain-- 
yet we do not deny the facts.

Take a little black flower seed and sow it. After it has been planted some 
time, dig it up. If it is whole, you know that it has no life; but if it has 
begun to decay, you know that life and fruitfulness will follow. There will 
be a resurrected life, and out of that little black seed will come a 
beautiful fragrant flower.  Here is a disgusting grub, crawling along the 
ground. By and by old age overtakes it, and it begins to spin its own 
shroud, to make its own sepulchre, and it lies as if in death. Look again, 
it has shuffled off its shroud, it has burst its sepulchre open, and it 
comes forth a beautiful butterfly, with different form and habits.

So with our bodies. They die, but God will give us glorified bodies in their 
stead. This is the law of the new creation as well as of the old: light 
after darkness; life after death; fruitfulness and glory after corruption 
and decay.  Thank God, we are to gain by death. We are to have something 
that death cannot touch. When this earthly body is raised, all the present 
imperfection will be gone. Jacob will leave his lameness. Paul will have no 
thorn in the flesh. We shall enter a life that deserves the name of life, 
happy, glorious, everlasting -- the body once more united to the soul, no 
longer mortal, subject to pain and disease and death, but glorified, 
incorruptible, "fashioned like unto his glorious body," everything that 
hinders the spiritual life left behind. We are exiles now, but then we who 
are faithful shall stand before the throne of God, joint heirs with Christ, 
kings and priests, citizens of that heavenly country.

A bright young girl of fifteen was suddenly cast upon a bed of suffering, 
completely paralyzed on one side, and nearly blind. She heard the family 
doctor say to her parents as they stood by the bedside, "She has seen her 
best days,  poor child!"  No, doctor," she exclaimed, "my best days are yet 
to come, when I shall see the King in His beauty."  [To be concluded]
_____________________________________________________________________

(3)   <DOCTRINAL>
"THREE TENSES OF SALVATION" (PART-2 OF 3)
William MacDonald

PAST TENSE

Here are some verses which speak primarily of salvation from the penalty of 
sin:  For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your 
own doing, it is the gift of God (Eph. 2:8 RSV).  (God) who hath saved us, 
and called us with an holy calling (2 Tim. 1:9).

Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy 
he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost 
(Tit. 3:5).

Note: In these three examples the word "saved" is in the past tense.  
However, there are other verses which speak of our deliverance from the 
penalty of sin where the verb is not in the past tense.  Neither is there 
salvation in any other, for there is none other name under heaven given 
among men whereby we must be saved (Acts 4:12).  That if thou shalt confess 
with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God 
hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved (Rom. 10:9).

So you must decide by the contents of the verse rather than by the tense of 
the verb whether the past tense of salvation is meant.  If the subject is 
the once-for-all deliverance from the condemnation of sin, then you know it 
is the past tense of salvation.

PRESENT TENSE

Although it is true that I have been saved, it is equally true that I am 
being saved day by day.  I have been saved from damnation; I am being saved 
from damage.  I have been saved from the penalty of sin; I am being saved 
from the power of sin.  I have been saved through the finished work of 
Christ on the Cross; I am being saved through His life and ministry for me 
at the right hand of God.  That is what is meant, for example, in Romans 
5:10:

For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his 
Son, much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life.

The present tense of salvation is much the same as sanctification-the 
process of being separated to God from sin and defilement.  It is this 
salvation as a continuing process that we read about in Hebrews 7:25:   
Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God 
by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.  [To be 
concluded]
---
Copyright 1975 by William MacDonald
_____________________________________________________________________

(4)   <PROPHETICAL>
"THE REDEEMER'S RETURN" (PART-56)
THE SIGNS OF THE REDEEMER'S RETURN (2/2)
Arthur W. Pink
....
As we study the Old Testament Scriptures we discover that a number of 
"Signs" were given to herald the first advent of Christ. There were 
conditions to be realized and certain events which would come to pass, and 
as these conditions were met and as these events occurred those who "looked 
for redemption in Jerusalem" (Luke 2:38) saw in these things so many 
intimations of the approach of Messiah's advent and His public 
manifestation. The Scriptures of Israel revealed the fact that the Redeemer 
would be born in Bethlehem of Judea (Micah 5:2); they foretold that He 
should be a lineal descendant of David and therefore of the Tribe of Judah 
(Ps. 132:11); they announced that a forerunner should go before Him make 
straight His way (Isaiah 40:3); they went so far as to set forth the 
approximate date of His appearing, namely, before the scepter had departed 
from Judah (Gen. 49:10), while the Temple was yet standing (Mal. 3:1), and 
sometime before the sixty-ninth week of Daniel had run its course (Dan. 
9:24-27). In like manner, the New Testament Scriptures also record certain 
"Signs" in connection with our Lord's second coming to the earth. We say "to 
the earth," for let it be distinctly understood that Scripture interposes 
nothing whatever between the present hour and the coming of Christ for His 
saints, when He descends into the air and catches them up to Himself. All 
the "Signs" recorded in the Word of God have to do with His return to the 
earth. But as there will be only a comparatively short interval between the 
two stages in the second coming of Christ, the Signs which proclaim the one 
announce the other. If the fulfillment of certain inspired predictions 
declare that the return of Christ to the earth is near at hand, then His 
descent to the air is so much nearer still. If we know that the end of the 
Age itself is now almost reached, then it is doubly certain that the rapture 
of the saints may occur at any hour. Yet, we repeat, the various Signs to 
which we shall call our readers' attention have to do with our Lord's return 
to the earth. We repeat this for the sake of warning, for as another has 
said, the business of the Christian is not to be looking for signs but 
listening for a Shout (Haldeman). Yet, while we ought not to be looking for 
signs we may look at them (W. Scott).

As we have said, the Old testament Scriptures foretold certain things 
concerning the Lord when He should appear: fore-announced Signs were to 
characterize the times of His advent. But the Jews failed to discern these 
Signs and the Saviour reproached them for their failure. Said He, "When it 
is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red. And in the 
morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O 
ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern 
the Signs of the Times?" (Matt. 16:2, 3). The reason why the Pharisees and 
Sadducees were blind to the significance of the things which were then 
transpiring before their eyes, was that they were ignorant of the contents 
of that Book in which these Signs were recorded. This is clear from the 
words of our Lord on many occasions--"Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures" 
  ( Matt. 22:29). The reason why they were ignorant of the contents and real 
meaning of the Scriptures was because they had substituted their own 
"tradition" for the Word of God (Mark 7:13). And history has repeated 
itself! We are living in a day when the vast majority of people are unable 
to "discern the Signs of the Times," when our religious leaders "err, not 
knowing the Scriptures" because they are following their own "tradition" 
rather than the Word of God. The Lord Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and 
Sadducees because they could "discern the face of the sky" but would not 
take the necessary pains to "discern the Signs of the Times." Then let us 
beware lest we fall through the same example of unbelief. Let us approach 
the Scriptures reverently and prayerfully, seeking to discover our position 
on the calendar of prophecy and thus be prepared for the solemn yet blessed 
events now so near at hand.

While it is true that the great majority of the Jews who lived during the 
days of our Lord's first advent failed to discern the Signs of the Times and 
in consequence did not profit by the announcements of their prophets, 
nevertheless, there were a few who were "waiting for the Consolation of 
Israel" (Luke 2:25), And so it is now. By the grace of God, there is a 
remnant today who are reading the Signs of the Times in the light cast by 
the prophetic Word. At some of these Signs we shall now look. [To be 
concluded]

_____________________<BrethrenVoice>_____________________
Subscribe, eMail:<brethrenvoice-subscribe@...>
Unsubscribe, eMail:<brethrenvoice-unsubscribe@...>
FAQs/Faith Statement, eMail: <brethrenvoice-faq@...>
<BrethrenVoice> Home: http://associate.com/digests/brethrenvoice/
<eFellowship> Home: http://groups.msn.com/BrethrenChristiansForum/
"Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith." 2 Cor 13:5
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." Jn 8:32



_________________________________________________________________
Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp