[brethrenvoice] Slice - The Polemic shot in the foot - Ravi Zacharias

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : May 2002 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "BV" <brethrenvoice@...>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:07:35 +0400
<BrethrenVoice>


05/30/02
THE POLEMIC SHOT IN THE FOOT
Ravi Zacharias

Some time ago I was speaking at a university in England, when a rather
exasperated person in the audience made his attack upon God.

"There cannot possibly be a God," he said, "with all the evil and suffering
that exists in the world!"

I asked, "When you say there is such a thing as evil, are you not assuming
that there is such a thing as good?"

"Of course," he retorted.

"But when you assume there is such a thing as good, are you not also
assuming that there is such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to
distinguish between good and evil?"

"I suppose so," came the hesitant and much softer reply.

"If, then, there is a moral law," I said, "you must also posit a moral law
giver.  But that is who you are trying to disprove and not prove.  If there
is no transcendent moral law giver, there is no absolute  moral law.  If
there is no moral law, there really is no good.  If there is no good there
is no evil.  I am not sure what your question is!"

There was silence and then he said,  "What, then, am I asking you?"

He was visibly jolted that at the heart of his question lay an assumption
that contradicted his own conclusion.

You see friends, the skeptic not only has to give an answer to his or her
own question, but also has to justify the question itself.  And even as the
laughter subsided I reminded him that his question was indeed reasonable,
but that his question justified my assumption that this was a moral
universe.  For if God is not the author of life, neither good nor bad are
meaningful terms.

This seems to constantly elude the critic who thinks that by raising the
question of evil, a trap has been sprung to destroy theism.  When in fact,
the very raising of the question ensnares the skeptic who raised the
question.  A hidden assumption comes into the open.  Moreover, as C. S.
Lewis reminds us, the moment we acknowledge something as being "better", we
are committing ourselves to an objective point of reference.

The disorienting reality to those who raise the problem of evil is that the
Christian can be consistent when he or she talks about the problem of evil,
while the skeptic is hard-pressed to respond to the question of good in an
amoral universe.  In short, the problem of evil is not solved by doing away
with the existence of God; the problem of evil and suffering must be
resolved while keeping God in the picture.

---
Copyright (p)(c) 2001 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM).
Reprinted with permission. A Slice of Infinity is a radio ministry of
Ravi Zacharias International Ministries

______________________________________________________________________
["EXAMINE YOURSELVES WHETHER YOU ARE IN FAITH." (2 Cor 13:5)]
[BrethrenVoice facilitates free flow of Christian information towards 
establishing the saved in the sustaining grace and leading the unsaved
to the saving grace.]  TO GOD BE THE GLORY!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: <brethrenvoice-unsubscribe@...>
To subscribe all messages, email: <brethrenvoice-subscribe@...>
To subscribe digest, email: <brethrenvoice-digest-subscribe@...>
To post a message to the List, forward: <brethrenvoice@...>
To contact the List Moderator, email: <brethrenvoice@...>
BrethrenVoice Home: http://associate.com/digests/brethrenvoice
eFellowship Home: http://communities.msn.co.uk/BrethrenChristiansForum