[brethrenvoice] Questioning the question

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : May 2002 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "BrethrenVoice" <brethrenvoice@...>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 13:05:37 +0400
<BrethrenVoice>


05/31/02 
QUESTIONING THE QUESTION
Ravi Zacharias  

As we have been discussing the theme of evil, we see how the presence of
evil raises the question of the goodness of God.  I have yet to hear a
skeptic who failed to raise this as a major reason for his or her
skepticism. The question is without doubt one of the most daunting
questions raised of the Christian faith, which talks of a loving God who is
in control of all things.

Unfortunately, glib and incoherent answers to such heart cries have
resulted in a breakdown of communication between honest skeptics seeking
the truth and those who claim to know it. But if the Christian can be
charged with ignoring the force of the question, then the questioner must
also face the indicting possibility that he or she has often not thought
through the question itself fairly. We have already seen how the question
does not disprove the existence of God, now we see how the skeptic answers
his own question about good and evil.

In a landmark debate between the agnostic philosopher Bertrand Russell and
the Christian philosopher Frederick Copleston, Copleston asked Russell if
he believed in good and bad.  Russell admitted that he did. Copleston then
asked him how he differentiated between the two.  Russell said that he
differentiated between good and bad in the same way that he distinguished
between colors.  "But you distinguish between colors by seeing, don't you? 
How then, do you judge between good and bad?"  "On the basis of feeling,
what else?" came Russell's sharp reply.  

Somebody should have told Russell that in some cultures people love their
neighbors while in other cultures they eat them--both on the basis of
feeling! Did Mr. Russell have a personal preference?

How can we possibly justify differentiating between good and bad merely on
the basis of feeling?  Whose feeling?  Hitler's or Mother Theresa's?  There
must be a transcendent moral law, a standard by which to determine good and
bad.  Without such a point of reference, the question of evil is no longer
coherent.  Removing God, the giver of the moral law, from the question of
evil, in essence, blunts the force of the question.

Yes, the "why" of evil must be spoken to and in fact, in the Bible God has.
 At the heart of evil is the will of man to resist the love of God.  In
response to an article entitled What's wrong with the world, G.K.Chesterton
replied : "I am, yours truly, G.K.Chesterton."  He was right.  We can all
reply the same way.  Only when we grasp this can the problem of evil begin
towards a solution. 

----
Copyright (p)(c) 2001 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM).
Reprinted with permission. A Slice of Infinity is a radio ministry of
Ravi Zacharias International Ministries

______________________________________________________________________
["EXAMINE YOURSELVES WHETHER YOU ARE IN FAITH." (2 Cor 13:5)]
[BrethrenVoice facilitates free flow of Christian information towards 
establishing the saved in the sustaining grace and leading the unsaved
to the saving grace.]  TO GOD BE THE GLORY!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: <brethrenvoice-unsubscribe@...>
To subscribe all messages, email: <brethrenvoice-subscribe@...>
To subscribe digest, email: <brethrenvoice-digest-subscribe@...>
To post a message to the List, forward: <brethrenvoice@...>
To contact the List Moderator, email: <brethrenvoice@...>
BrethrenVoice Home: http://associate.com/digests/brethrenvoice
eFellowship Home: http://communities.msn.co.uk/BrethrenChristiansForum