WHERE IS THE SPIRIT OF ELIJAH? When Ahab led the nation of Israel into unrighteousness, Elijah stood up to him. In Luke 1:17, the Bible speaks of one named John the Baptist who came "in the spirit and power of Elijah." John the Baptist had several things in common with Elijah, including a tenacious call for his king's repentance. Where is the spirit of Elijah in our pulpits today? Our President has had a sexual relationship with a young woman who was placed in his care and trust. A young woman who was young enough to be his own daughter. He sexually exploited her and told her that there was nothing wrong or sinful about it. No corporate executive, no military officer, no counselor, or clergyman could dare to think that he could get away with such behavior. Yet, our President claims that this was "a private matter." What about Bob Packwood, was his a private affair? What about Gary Hart, was his a private affair? What about Jim Bakker, was his a private affair? What about Jimmy Swaggert? Were these indiscretions all private matters? Should there be a distinction between our President's private and public "affairs"? Bill Clinton said that this is a matter between him, his wife, his daughter, and his God. This makes me wonder if that is the same God that said, "Thou shalt not commit adultery" and "Thou shalt not bear false witness"? If so, what part of "THOU SHALT NOT" does our President not understand? Furthermore, if a man repeatedly betrays those who are in his private trust, what's to stop him from eventually betraying those in his public trust? What saddens me most about this whole scandal is the reaction of the American people. Some polls show that Bill Clinton's approval ratings actually gained two points on the day that Kenneth Starr's report was made public. It seems that America is more interested in money than in righteousness. This is not surprising in lieu of the fact that many of the people who sit in our American churches don't want to hear a message on righteousness and holy living. They want to hear about wealth, prosperity, and the good life. Enough of America's religious leaders have pandered to such wishes for long enough to train many of America's Christians to believe that money counts more than righteousness? Their ears have been tickled with a message of prosperity for so long that our nation's Christians are more concerned with the economy than with Christian character. I believe it is time for us to return to the Bible and see what it has to say about which is more important. 1Tim.6:10 says "The love of money causes all kinds of evil. Some people have left the faith, because they wanted to get more money, but they have caused themselves much sorrow." (NCV) I personally do not believe that Bill Clinton is fit for public office. However, I believe that we need to distinguish the difference between the man and the office. As a man, Mr. Clinton needs to be forgiven and encouraged. On the other hand, as our President, he has lied to the American people. He has blatantly broken the laws which he had sworn to uphold. He has betrayed our trust, and he is no longer fit to run the country. I am well aware of the fact that he has claimed numerous times to have repented. However, people who are truly repentant don't use the word "but" when they make their confession. They don't say, "I have sinned, BUT I wouldn't have been caught if it hadn't been for Kenneth Starr." They don't say, "I have sinned, BUT 'that woman' made me do it!" This is in the same class as the old comedian's line, "The devil made me do it." True repentance doesn't place blame on others or on circumstances. True repentance says, "Forgive me Lord, for *I* have sinned!" There are some religious leaders who have attempted to compare our President's indiscretions with those of King David in the Bible. I find two problems with this comparison. First of all, Bill Clinton is not a King David. He has never shown the moral integrity that David had before he fell. Neither has Bill Clinton shown the type of repentance which King David expressed in Psalm 51. Second of all, kings were not replaced by impeachment. They were replaced either by assassination or by military conquest. Even if David had deserved to be replaced, who was going to take his place at that point, and how would it have been accomplished? Furthermore, in over 25 years of ministry, I have counseled numerous couples who have gone through such personal problems as the Clinton family is now facing. Acknowledgment of infidelity in the family is not something which is easily dealt with. A couple doesn't just get up the next morning, smile at everyone, and say "It's behind us now!" It takes months and even years for such things to be worked through. If Bill Clinton is sincere about dealing with the wounds which he has inflicted upon his wife and daughter, then he needs to resign and spend the energy and time that it takes to repair the breach. I believe it is impossible for a man to be the leader of a large business, a huge ministry, or especially of this nation and still spend the time that it takes to mend his family from such disloyalty and breach of trust. I believe our President should resign, and I believe that those who would be modern day Elijah's should be asking for his resignation. Regards, Roger Griffith griff@... http://www.joywell.org/