[faithandlife] Re: [FaithandLife] A Sacrament Is A Sacrament

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : September 2005 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "William H. Perkins, Jr." <wperkin2@...>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:37:02 -0400
Mark+:

Amen!!

Bill+
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Clavier+" <anglican@...>
To: <faithandlife@...>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FaithandLife] A Sacrament Is A Sacrament


> Glenn+,
>
> I have to disagree with you here!  I think to be fair to +Robinson's 
> supporters the intent was to conescrate him bishop of New Hampshire with 
> the understanding that one's sexual predilications are neither here nor 
> there. I happen to disagree with them about that, but I don't think it 
> invalidates the consecration.  After all, if it does, would not all the 
> consecration performed with purely political intentions (such as with 
> Becket, for example) be invalid?  Are we perhaps confusing intention with 
> motive?
>
> In my conversations with Episcopal bishops (which around here happens with 
> some frequency!), I find that most have a Catholic view of Holy Orders but 
> believe that that view can and ought to include women and homosexuals. 
> Again, I disagree with them.  But there it is.
>
> Frankly, I think what should have happened is that the moment +Robinson 
> was consecrated someone should have presented him, in accordance with 
> Ecusa Canons, for immoral conduct.  That would have been fun!
>
> Mark+
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: 
> faithandlife-unsubscribe@...
>
>