I swear he's omniscient....

MLW+

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Waterhouse+ [mailto:RalphW@...] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:31 PM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] Apostolic Orders

I'd agree with you, if I could only lay hands (no pun intended) on my
dictionary!
RW+

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Ward [mailto:mward@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:33 PM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] Apostolic Orders


To the Chadisms folder!!!!!

MLW+

-----Original Message-----
From: Father Chandler Holder Jones [mailto:fatherchad@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:23 PM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: [FaithandLife] Apostolic Orders

If sacramental ordination of ministers from protestant communions who lack
Apostolic Orders is inappropriate, then what does one do with the preface to

the Ordinal of 1662, which is an authoritative Anglican formulary?:

'No man shall be accounted or taken to be a lawful Bishop, Priest, or
Deacon, in this Church... except he be called, tried, examined, and admitted

thereunto, according to the Form hereafter following, or hath had Episcopal
Consecration or Ordination.'

Any wilful ongoing rejection of this axiomatic formulary, which has been
binding on the Church of England and her daughter Churches since the
Restoration, is simply un-Anglican, not to mention contumacious.

God bless you!

Chad+





--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...


--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...




--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...