[faithandlife] Saving the significance of symbols in a multi-cultural society

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : December 2002 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Charles Scott" <crscott@...>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 06:30:47 +0000
From Christian Week, Canada's National Christian Newspaper

Oh, Christmas tree

For a very short time, the brightly festooned fir in front of Toronto's city 
hall was called a "holiday" tree. When people began to ask what happened to 
the word "Christmas," the city's executive director of tourism explained 
that Christmas was too exclusive in Canada's multicultural society. "We want 
to get the message out that [the Cavalcade of Lights] is an inclusive 
celebration," he said.

Nonsense, replied a chorus of voices. In fact, no one had complained about 
the tree being called a Christmas tree. And Bernie Farber, executive 
director of the Canadian Jewish Congress of Ontario, observed that taking 
away or changing the names of symbols for any religious group is denying 
Canadians their right to a truly multicultural society. "The tree in front 
of City Hall is a Christmas tree," he said. "The menorah in front of Queen's 
Park is a menorah, not a candelabra...We should really be celebrating 
traditions, not looking for a way to deny them."

This well-stated rebuttal to the ongoing secular bleaching of faith from 
public life is very welcome. But while politicians in Toronto bowed 
immediately to public pressure and without debate voted unanimously on 
November 27 to officially refer to the 16-metre tree in Nathan Phillips 
Square as a "Christmas tree," the underlying issue is not likely to 
disappear so quickly.

Many Canadian already celebrate "winter" festivals, attend "holiday" 
concerts, participate in a variety of "light" cavalcades or parades and 
gather around "multicultural" trees decked out with menorahs and symbols 
from other faiths. That these celebrations normally occur during traditional 
Christianity's Advent and Christmas season is a mark of Christianity's 
pervasive influence on our culture. But this culture is changing, and the 
diminution of symbols is an important indicator of things to come.

One ethics consultant commenting on the Toronto tree simply observed that 
the word Christmas is associated with Christianity, and only by removing the 
word does the holiday take on an air of neutrality without religious 
undertones. This makes the extraordinary assumption that religious tones of 
any sort are not welcome in public life. Sadly, all too many Canadians are 
content to drift toward a dominant secularism, taking it on faith that this 
represents a neutral position.

But excluding or demeaning religious expression is not the best way to reap 
the benefits of a multicultural society. The multifaith reality does not 
mean we must abandon beliefs in order to be properly inclusive. It does mean 
we who would uphold religious faith in public settings must be properly 
respectful of any who believe otherwise, humble in the manner we commend our 
convictions and gracious in our public presence.

This is what Christians should practise, what we should expect from 
practitioners of other religions and what we should expect from governments.

Christians, of all people, should know that societal acceptance of religious 
holidays is not the real measure of our faith; and the Christmas tree is a 
compromised symbol at best. The way to embed a truly authentic Christian 
presence in the culture is for those who claim the name of Christ to draw 
near to Him, and allow Him to transform our lives. That's the real reason we 
celebrate this season.






_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963