[faithandlife] U.S. Senate To Vote On Homosexual Marriage

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : May 2006 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: charles scott <crscottblu@...>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:01:45 -0700 (PDT)

Franklin Sanders Christ our Hope R.E.
Mission,Westpoint, Tennessee wrote:

><snip>
> 
> 
The state gains jurisdiction over marriage ONLY 
because people apply  for and get that license. 
Without the license, the state has no  jurisdiction
over the marriage.  Of course, marriage is an
inalienable  common law right, and those who are
"competent" can  marry without the
 state's permission, within the church's jurisdiction.
> 
Once Christian people stop asking the state for
permission to do  what they are already free to do, in
other words, top entering into state marriages, then
the whole homosexual marriage issue
> slides into the sea.  It  appears in all its innate
ridiculousness.
> 
 Yours in the bonds of Christ,
 Franklin Sanders
 Christ our Hope R.E. Mission,Westpoint, Tennessee
>"-----------------------------------------


Sounds right to me, but there is of course property
rights, inheritance rights, etc to be considered.  

By having the state do the civil marriage, property
rights and all the other legalities would be taken
care of.  

The Church then could witness the Covenantal union and
administer the Sacrament without being embroiled in
needless controversy.  The Church's stance and
definition of marriage would be clear.

I don't see how the Church can witness marriage in our
culture and advise that people ignore the state's
jurisidiction.  The state does have a proper role to
play.  I just don't see why the Church should be
involved at all in the state's role. 

An attorney commented that he was tempted at times to
advise elderly couples to not marry for tax and other
legal reasons.  We have all heard stories of elderly
couples divorcing for financial reasons, while still
living together.  

It would hardly be a becoming thing for the Church to
be in a position of encouraging divorce for reasons of
inheritance, to save tax dollars or to qualify for
some government benefit.  

That said, I still think it would be beneficial to not
have clergy serve as civil servants doing marriages
for the state.

Charles+
Church of the Good Shepherd, Indianapolis