[faithandlife] Marginalized, not persecuted, and a window of opportunity

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : May 2006 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: charles scott <crscottblu@...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Fr. David+

These United States will most likely pass laws making
odd couplings legal for the purpose of passing on
property and tax breaks.  I suspect the courts will
find this to be fair and equitable.

If Churches decided to have nothing to do with the
State's definition of marriage and refused to be
agents of the State, the worst that is likely to
happen to Churches that do not allow their clergy to
become Marrying Sams is that they would lose their tax
exemptions.  We will always be called bigoted Bible
Thumpers and possibly worse, whether we take such a
stand or not.

If clergy do not allow themselves to become agents of
the state, and the church is not beholden to the state
for receiving special benefits, then I think we are
out of the controversy but not beyond the contempt. 
The servant should never expect to receive better
treatment than his Lord.

We are dealing with more than a mound of fire ants
here.  The coalition of pagans and those promoting the
gay-agenda out-maneuvered Christians in the business
and political world decades ago.  I suspect they have
enough voters that congress will roll over. The
secular world doesn't need or want to launch a violent
attack on Christians to have their way; they have
already won in the market place of ideas in the
post-Christian western nations.  The movies, books and
general media attest to the general decline of the
west, and that element of the media have helped carry
the day for the secularists.  Many Christian
organizations are cash cows for the secularists.  Da
Vinci Codes' success is but one more symptom of the
malaise and the gullibility of our people.  Sadly,
many Christian dollars will go into the coffers of he
secularists who produced this travesty; a lesser
amount will go into the accounts of expert
commentators such as Elaine Pagels.

The international conditions that created Nazi Germany
and sent a generation hooting back to the ancient war
gods are not the same conditions creating secularism
in our day and in our country.  The secularists have
already won without firing a shot and control the
media and the wealth and get their way politically
regardless of which party is in office.  They enjoy
our tacit approval and support in the market place.  A
sort of populist Christian politics gets lip service
and not much more. 

The secularists do not need to make martyrs in order
to have power, they already have it.  The powers that
be profit by allowing diversity.  They let us mutter
in the background while we pay our dues.

I'm not pessimistic.  There is still plenty of room in
America for Christians to live exemplary lives and to
teach.  We won't win in the halls of congress at this
time, however.  To change the nation will take at
least a generation of effort.

In my opinion the place to begin to instill Christian
family values is not with the legislatures but with
young couples.   I find that people as they take on
family responsibility, rearing their infant children
are more inclined to accept the values taught by our
faith than any other age group.  From the time that I
began rearing children, I have observed that young
moms and dads tend to be more conservative than
teeners or older adults.  

It is difficult to bridge the genertion gap initially.
When I moved to Indianapolis 2 years ago, I knew not
one person who newly married.  The youngest person in
the congregation was in his 50's.  Most were retired.
 
Over a year passed before we received our first couple
and one single person who was in their 20's.

This year our efforts are beginning to be rewarded.
In my last two confirmation classes with young adults,
I began not with Baptism and Eucharist, but with
Jesus' teaching in regard to marriage.  Using John,
(the Signs Gospel) and talking about the signs that
God is still with us, I showed that Jesus began his
ministry and signs at the Wedding Feast in Cana.   I
raised the question, "Is marriage a sign of God's
working in a holy family or is it a "living hell?"  By
beginning with the Wedding Feast at Cana, using the
Prayer Book and the Scripture we talk about the
realities of marriage and whether Christ can be
incarnate in marriage in these times.  After working
through Jesus and Paul's teaching in regard to how the
marriage covenantal relationship is to be like that
between Christ and the Church, we are in a position to
talk about real things.  

Incarnational theology is no longer so abstract, but
focused in daily life and makes the concepts of
Baptism into Christ a real thing.

To my surprise, young families began asking for prayer
books to begin devotions around the table in their
homes, and asked for further instruction and books.  

A mother with infant in arms, and a father concerned
for spouse and child know from experience the meaning
of sacrificial service.  They know the value and
fragility of life and take it seriously.  

This past Sunday Bp Shaver visited Church of the Good
Shepherd.  Eight adults received confirmation.  All
but two of these were in their twenties. We have two
more young couples that were out of town but intend to
be confirmed in August.  These young people are
willing to take up positions of service as they are
trained and are eager to bring in others.  I may be
day-dreaming, but it appears these young people are
determined to redeem their time.

I seldom see this kind of passion in older adults; and
certainly not in our legislators.

On a lighter note, a lady dropped into our insurance
office and commented that she had learned from the Da
Vinci Code movie that the Last Supper painting was not
a real portrait of Jesus and the Apostles, but was
painted centuries later.  Who'd have thought it?


Charles+
Church of the Good Shepherd, Indianapolis

--- Stlukesangch@... wrote:

> Charles and Franklin, 
>  
What you say sounds all well and good for now, but
it is the future that worries me.  I have already
experienced personal confrontation from  homosexuals 
for promoting hate speech (which I have not done)
for simply being a  traditional Anglican.  I believe
we are going to see  a time in the not so  distant  
future when we are not only going to be further
marginalized but we will  be  persecuted.