[faithandlife] END OF ECUMENISM

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : July 2006 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: charles scott <crscottblu@...>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Brothers+

Again END OF ECUMENISM is an appropriate title for the
news of the past week.

Sometime ago Walter Kasper indicated talks with
Anglicans would have to be put on hold because of
aberrations in Anglicanism.  Then the ARCIC document
gave some a hope that rapprochement would continue.

Walter Kasper again has to draw back with a trenchant
comment, "Without identity, no society, least of all a
church, can continue to survive."

This situation is no cause for joy.  The Archbishop of
Canterbury must be grieved to read such comments.  It
is sad to witness the end of a career for one who
thirty years ago must have had dreams of a united
Church, but now sees fragmentation and wounds that
will not soon heal.

ECUSA is no longer in a position to promote the
ecumenical movement.  Who would listen?

Below is an article from http://www.zenit.org/

Charles+
Church of the Good Shepherd, Indianapolis

"---------------------------------------

ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome  Code: ZE06071502
Date: 2006-07-15

Anglicanism at the Crossroads
Changes Put Future of Church in Doubt

NEW YORK, JULY 15, 2006 (Zenit.org).- Recent decisions
by the Anglican Church in Britain and the United
States have raised the specter of further splits. Last
weekend, the Church of England's Synod voted in favor
of allowing women to be ordained bishops. 

Already 14 out of the 38 autonomous Anglican churches
in other countries have approved women bishops,
reported the BBC on Monday. The British decision,
however, was important given the status of England as
the home of Anglicanism. 

During the Synod debate the Archbishop of Canterbury,
Rowan Williams, told participants that bishops had a
special leadership role in the Church, and that just
because it had women priests, it did not mean that
women bishops were legitimate, the BBC reported. In
the end the vote was 288 in favor of women bishops and
119 against. 

The vote in favor of women bishops came shortly after
data revealed the increasing presence of women clergy.
Fourteen years after the go-ahead for women priests in
the U.K., 283 women were recommended for the seminary
last year, compared with 295 men, reported the
London-based Times newspaper, June 24. 

The experience of the Anglican Church in Britain was
recently analyzed by Hilary De Lyon, chief executive
of the Royal College of General Practitioners. She
contributed a chapter to the study "Production Values:
futures for professionalism," published June 22 by the
U.K. think-tank Demos. 

The first women deacons were ordained in 1987, and
women were permitted to enter the full priesthood in
1994, explained De Lyon. Although it has been only 12
years since women were first ordained, they already
make up over 20% of clergy, and hold 50% of the unpaid
posts held by priests. In addition, they hold only one
in six of the paid posts and one in five of the
chaplaincy posts. 

Two-tier church 

The latest vote comes after a long period of tensions
in the Anglican church. Shortly before the Synod
meeting the Archbishop of Canterbury announced that
all the national churches would be asked to sign a
covenant declaring they believed in the basic biblical
tenets of Anglican doctrine, reported the Times
newspaper, June 28. 

Williams threatened that those who refuse to sign the
declaration would be excluded from full membership of
the Church and would instead become "associates." The
proposal will be discussed by the Anglicans at the
2008 Lambeth Conference. 

Anglican disunity is not the only threat; ecumenical
relations are also in doubt. Before last weekend's
vote Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the
Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity,
warned that allowing women to be ordained bishops
would further complicate attempts to achieve unity. 

In comments reported by the Times, June 7, the
cardinal said that as it was, the ordination of women
as priests had led to a "cooling off" in the relations
between the two churches. The advent of women bishops
would cause a "serious and long-lasting chill." He
also warned that: "Without identity, no society, least
of all a church, can continue to survive." 

American divisions 

On the other side of the Atlantic, the American branch
of the Anglican Church, the Episcopalians, continues
to be riven by disputes. In May, Episcopalians in San
Francisco did avoid electing a homosexual as local
bishop, reported the Washington Post, May 7. Instead
they chose Mark Handley Andrus, currently the bishop
suffragan from the diocese of Alabama. 
Andrus ran against six other candidates, three of whom
live openly with same-sex partners, according to the
Post article. 

But the following month controversy arose over the
election by the Episcopal General Convention of Nevada
bishop, Jefferts Schori, as its leader in America. She
is the first woman to head a national grouping of the
Anglican Communion, reported the Washington Post, June
19. 

Her election immediately raised concerns. Schori had
backed the election of a declared homosexual, V. Gene
Robertson, as a bishop in 2003. Before this, no openly
homosexual bishop had ever been consecrated in the
history of the Anglican Church. Moreover, the same
meeting of American Episcopalians that elected Schori
refused to impose a moratorium on the election of
additional homosexual bishops, reported Reuters, June
20. 

Reacting to the election of Schori, the Bishop of
Rochester, England, Michael Nazir-Ali, said that
divisions between liberals and conservatives were so
profound that a compromise was no longer possible. His
comments came in an interview published June 19 by the
British newspaper, the Telegraph. 

"Anglicans are used to fudging things sometimes, but I
think this is a matter of such seriousness that fudge
won't do," said Bishop Nazir-Ali. 

Nigeria's Anglican bishops had even stronger words,
saying that the U.S. branch is "a cancerous lump" that
should be "excised," reported the BBC on July 4. 

Doubts over where Schori will lead Episcopalians were
raised by her statements in the days following the
election. In a sermon shortly after her election she
referred to "our mother Jesus," reported the Times,
June 22. 

Then, in an interview published in the July 17 issue
of Time magazine, Schori was asked: "What will be your
focus as head of the U.S. church?" She replied saying:
"Our focus needs to be on feeding people who go to bed
hungry, on providing primary education to girls and
boys, on healing people with AIDS, on addressing
tuberculosis and malaria, on sustainable development.
That ought to be the primary focus." 

Meltdown 

The sort of priorities outlined by Shori were strongly
criticized by Charlotte Allen, Catholicism editor for
Beliefnet, in an opinion article published July 9 by
the Los Angeles Times. The fragmentation of
Anglicanism, she explained, is not just due to
doctrinal disputes. "It also is about the meltdown of
liberal Christianity," she said. 

Liberal Christianity was hailed as the future of the
Christian Church, but Allen observed, all the churches
and movements within churches that have "blurred
doctrine and softened moral precepts are
demographically declining and, in the case of the
Episcopal Church, disintegrating." 

"When a church doesn't take itself seriously, neither
do its members" argued Allen. As recently as 1960
churches such as the Episcopalians, Presbyterians,
Methodists, and Lutherans accounted for 40% of all
American Protestants. Today the number has plummeted
to around 12%. 

Allen cited data from the Hartford Institute for
Religious Research, showing that in 1965 there were
3.4 million Episcopalians; now, there are 2.3 million.


Her comments echoed the thesis of the book, "Exodus:
Why Americans are Fleeing Liberal Churches for
Conservative Christianity," (Sentinel) published last
year. According to author Dave Shiflett, Americans are
leaving liberal denominations for churches that preach
strict moral norms and uphold traditional beliefs. 

Liberal theologians and bishops get plenty of media
coverage, observes Shiflett. But the average
churchgoer wants to attend a church where they can get
something not obtainable elsewhere, which doesn't
include trendy opinions on current topics. "They want
the Good News, not the minister's political views or
intellectual coaching." 

Shiflett explained that data from the Glenmary
Research Center on church membership showed that
conservative congregations are growing fastest. This
includes the Southern Baptist Convention, up 5% in the
decade 1990-2000; and Pentecostal groups such as the
Assemblies of God, and the Church of God, up 18.5% and
40% respectively, in the same period. 

As a general observation, churches that adhere to
traditional teaching, offer transcendent truth and
demand a high commitment from their members are those
that enjoy growth. Following the latest liberal
trends, on the other hand, leads to decline. Something
for all Christians to consider. 


email this article

To receive ZENIT News Services by e-mail ! 
Back 
Home Page