General Revelation in the city of Watertown Brothers+ Watertown’s First Baptist Church http://www.newswatch50.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=85784A1C-7A96-45F3-B35F-D0097390E8B5 The First Baptist Church in Watertown, New York, came to national prominence because it fired an 81 year old lady from her role as teacher in Sunday School. In the letter of dismissal on Church stationary the Baptist authority quoted I Timothy 2:11 and 12 as a reason. The new pastor at First Baptist has risen to prominence in the community and has won election to a seat on city council. Interestingly, from a political point of view, the chairman of the city council is a lady. When a male citizen of Watertown was questioned whether the church’s decision would affect the pastor’s political future, the man commented to the effect that 500 years ago the action would not have been questioned but “in this day and time” he finds the pastor’s attitude “disturbing.” From a theological point of view the case is interesting. For Christians who take Scripture as prime authority, the hermeneutical question is pertinent in all ages of the church. Was Paul addressing specific situations or laying out a general principle for the whole church (I Cor 14:34)? Be careful of your answer lest you bring Scripture into conflict with Scriptures (a hermeneutical no-no), and St. Paul in conflict with himself. A certain man in the New Testament had daughters who were prophets and note that the same Paul who wrote I Timothy 2:11 and 12 also reminisces on the “unfeigned faith” in Timothy engendered by his grandmother Lois and his mother Eunice (II Timothy 1:5) and this was a result of the fact that “from a babe thou hast known the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” (II Timothy 3:14-16). This same Paul in other epistles refers to women who prominent in the Church and refers to churches in their households. The conversation on Faith and Life has been circumspect in regard to women’s roles, and rightly so. Basic hermeneutical principles militate against proof-texting. Obviously it would have been incumbent on the Baptist Magisteral Authority to look at least to the entirety of both of St Paul’s letters to Timothy and the entire Pauline corpus before jumping to a conclusion. The question of the extent of General Revelation in the city of Watertown has to be considered. Has that which may be discerned concerning the nature and will of God raised to a higher level in the general populace than in the understanding of Special Revelation given to the teaching authority of the First Baptist Church in Watertown? Church and State questions loom ominously in the background. Could civil suits at present and future legal statues concerning discrimination be part of the picture? In the newpaper article linked above, Mrs. Lambert indicated she would not contest the firing and expressed that she might not leave her church. However, in a CNN interview that aired this morning, she indicated she would be going to another church and continue teaching. She also commented that it was “church politics” that was behind the dismissal. These and many other questions deserve re-examination. I’m not talking about re-examining qualifications for Presbyter, as I do believe that one is settled. But when it comes to other roles. . . . . Charles+