[faithandlife] RE: [FaithandLife] Re: faithandlife Digest

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : April 2008 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Michael L. Ward" <mward@...>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:01:02 -0400
Whatever happened to that quintessentially Anglican style of Scripture and
Liturgy, i.e., poetry?

MLW+

-----Original Message-----
From: bpfick@... [mailto:bpfick@...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:47 PM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: [FaithandLife] Re: faithandlife Digest 

Brothers

The response to my quick review of the AMiA prayer book and the word "quick"
is important was well received.  Thank you. DH+

Far be it to imply 1662 = protestant, while 1928 = catholic.  Agreed it is,
on it's face, a fallacy. 


My points were not well expressed.  Of course, if the purpose of the AMiA
book is merely to provide a modern translation of the 1662, then one could
expect to find no more party sympathies within the modern version than one
could find in the original.  Agreed. 


That said, I repeat, this edition, while faithful to orthodoxy and faithful
to the 1662 Anglican tradition, holds no particular allure to my heart. 


I also repeat, I find it's lack of classic Anglican pentameter off putting,
it's publishing layout screams "low budget affair", and it's decision to be
nothing more than a modern translation of the 1662 of little enticement
personally.   I remain quite unsure as to what contribution this little book
makes.

+FGF




_____________________________________________________________
Click to become a designer and quit your boring job.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2111/fc/REAK6ZpPAKYFlaNmTTtNq9R1l60utBak
Zc18xhJsSdpVfk8b0KtBNZ/

--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...