Can you send me a copy?  If you can send it to my email.
Thanks
John


-----Original Message-----
From: "Rev. Dr. Derrick Hassert" <cranmerandlaud@...>
To: faithandlife@...
Sent: 4/2/08 6:29 PM
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] Re: faithandlife Digest 

True. The Toon book, while orthodox, lacks a great deal of ++Cranmer's inherent or well honed gift for poetry. I would still commend it for purchase and review, and perhaps use in AMiA, but if we already have the 1662 or 1928 books in use there is no reason for a departure from them. I use a modern language 1662 approved for the REC for use at a monthly rest home service, as I mentioned, and I like it because it flows like the original when prayer through--fewer things to trip over in comparison to the Toon book.
   
  DH+

"Michael L. Ward" <mward@...> wrote:
  Whatever happened to that quintessentially Anglican style of Scripture and
Liturgy, i.e., poetry?

MLW+

-----Original Message-----
From: bpfick@... [mailto:bpfick@...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:47 PM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: [FaithandLife] Re: faithandlife Digest 

Brothers

The response to my quick review of the AMiA prayer book and the word "quick"
is important was well received. Thank you. DH+

Far be it to imply 1662 = protestant, while 1928 = catholic. Agreed it is,