[faithandlife] Re: [FaithandLife] Election

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : June 2003 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: H2ohouseRW@...
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:59:02 -0400
Erich+
Wouldn't he be a bishop who should not receive Communion (even at hiw own consecration) until..."he has truly repented and amended his former evil life, etc..." (pg. 84-85 BCP).

Ralph+

"St. Mary's Church, Delray Beach" <stmary@...> wrote:

>Brothers,
>
>I thought I would throw in a "red herring" about the Robinson situation to
>give us something to think about, especially with our relationships with
>ECUSA and the "Official" Anglican Communion.
>
>Robinson is actually a proper object for consecration. He is man. The fact
>that he is a "notorious" sinner does not affect this. The women that have
>been "consecrated" and "ordained" are not proper objects for the sacrament
>therefore we don't recognize them as such. But by our sacramental
>understanding of Holy Orders, Robinson will be a Bishop when consecrated and
>we have to recognize as such when it happens.
>
>What think ye?
>
>Erich+
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Mark Clavier+" <anglican@...>
>To: <faithandlife@...>
>Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:59 AM
>Subject: [FaithandLife] Election
>
>
>> Y'all,
>>
>> For any who care, I have been keeping track of how the votes are lining up
>> with regards to the confirmation of the election of Gene Robinson at
>Ecusa's
>> General Convention.  Obviously, if it is approved it will dramatically
>> affect our ecumenical talks with the Episcopal Church.  Because of the
>> nature of those clerical and lay delegates who go to convention (ie those
>> either wealthy enough or activist enough to devote two and half weeks to
>> Convention) there is no doubt that Robinson will be approved by the House
>of
>> Delegates.  The vote in the House of Bishops will be much closer.  At
>> present, it stands as 22 for approval, 29 against, and 58 undeclared.  A
>> simple majority of 53 is needed for approval.
>>
>> As of now, approval of liturgies for same-sex unions has about as much of
>a
>> chance of being approved as Mike+ and Paul+ have of singing at the Met!
>>
>> Mark+
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "charles scott" <charlesrscott@...>
>> To: <faithandlife@...>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:45 AM
>> Subject: [FaithandLife] PRAYER BEFORE LECTIO DIVINA --The Story
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --------- Original Message ---------
>> >
>> > DATE: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:40:27
>> > From: "Mark Clavier+" <anglican@...>
>> > >Mike+,
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Fr. Mark wrote:
>> >
>> > Mike+,
>> >
>> > I spent my entire Bible Study on this yesterday, but from a different
>> angle. I first instructed them about worldviews, or metanrratives, and how
>> they dominate our perception of reality.  I then explained to them that we
>> are now moving from an Enlightenment worldview to a postmodern one, and
>how,
>> in postmodernity, the story or the narrative is everything.  In a sense
>this
>> is less a development than a restoration.
>> >
>> > When you look at Acts, you don't find Peter, Stephen, and Paul teaching
>> doctrine.  Almost always they tell a story, and almost always, that story
>is
>> the epic of Israel culminating in the death and resurrection of Jesus.
>> >
>> > This is very different then how we have proceeded with teaching the
>faith
>> for the past 300 years (and more especially the past 100).  During this
>> time, doctrine was the thing taught.
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > In the postmodern world, the Church is going to have to get back to the
>> story.  Doctrine remains important, not because it gives us a bunch a
>rules
>> about God and ourselves, but BECAUSE it tells us how to read and live out
>> that story correctly.  And by reading and living out the Biblical
>> metanarrative (to which I would add the history of the Church) that
>people's
>> lives will be shaped and their faith nurtured.
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > Mark+
>> > ------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > Mark+
>> >
>> > Your post resonates with me.  The manner you described your Bible Study
>> reminded me of the professor I referred to in my last post, and the person
>> who has had the most influence on the manner in which I try to teach.
>> >
>> > He was a graduate of a Disciple of Christ Seminary and had a B.D. from
>> Harvard as well.  He was near the end of his long career when I had the
>> pleasure of being led by him in the study of Greek and Gospels.  Though he
>> was well past retirement age, he still had the ability to be excited by
>his
>> studies, which he continued.  In the mid 1950's, I recall his excitement
>> about the discoveries at Qumran and the texts as they appeared.
>> >
>> > He was not typical of Bible fundamentalists of the mid last century. His
>> thorough knowledge of the history of the times made his descriptions of
>> scenes in the life of Christ vivid, compelling and believable.  That is
>why,
>> when I found N.T. Wright's books, they excited me for here was an Anglican
>> who knew how to tell the story.
>> >
>> > My Gospel professor would draw a class of a 150 into the story.  He was
>> capable of anger and tears and unashamed of showing emotion in the midst
>of
>> an eloquent exposition.   His classes were the best attended, with more
>> people signing on than there was space available in normal classrooms.
>> Arrangements had to be made to hold his classes in large halls.  Some
>would
>> repeat as auditors year after year, so as to miss nothing in his 4-year
>> cycle of Gospel lectures.  The man was demanding.  Laziness was not
>> tolerated. He expected a person asking a question to be able to stand up
>to
>> an oral examination in front of his peers as to how much he had read, from
>> what sources, and his understanding of the material.  He personally read
>all
>> papers and his critiques included corrections of grammar and punctuation
>as
>> well as clarity and comprehension of the subject.  I still prize a paper
>> written 45 years ago that has his signature and a "well done" comment,
>more
>> highly valued by his students t
>> > han our Diplomas.
>> >
>> > Your line "the story or the narrative is everything.  In a sense this is
>> less a development than a restoration" would have brought a bright smile
>and
>> a nod of the head, and a hearty amen from the old man who impressed on us
>> how important restoring telling of the story is in our times.  The story
>is
>> everything.
>> >
>> > Charles+
>> >
>> > --------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
>> > http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to
>> <faithandlife-unsubscribe@...>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to
><faithandlife-unsubscribe@...>
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <faithandlife-unsubscribe@...>
>
>

__________________________________________________________________
McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network.
Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397

Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge.  Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455