[faithandlife] Canada Accepts court ruling traditional definition of marriage is unconstitutional

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : June 2003 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: charles scott <crscottblu@...>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
LAW OF THE LAND

Canada set to legalize 'gay' marriage
Accepts court ruling that traditional definition
unconstitutional

 
Posted: June 18, 2003
1:00 p.m. Eastern
WorldNetDaily.com 

Same-sex marriage is on the way to enshrinement in
Canadian law following the government's decision
yesterday not to appeal a provincial court's ruling
that allowed homosexuals to be wed. 

Prime Minister Jean Chrétien will file a bill within
weeks that would make Canada only the third country to
sanction same-sex matrimony, along with Belgium and
the Netherlands. 

Jean Chrétien
"There is an evolution of society," Chretien said in
making the announcement. 

Last week, Toronto began issuing 'gay' marriage
licenses after an Ontario court set aside the
heterosexual definition of marriage as
unconstitutional. 

Chrétien emphasized the bill will allow religious
groups to refuse to perform same-sex weddings. 
"What is important for me is the freedom of the
churches to interpret according to their faith," he
said, according to the National Post. 

However, evangelical groups, who oppose same-sex
marriage, say they will keep a close eye on that
aspect of the bill, particularly since the right of
religious exemption was not addressed in the Ontario
court's ruling. 

"We are deeply concerned that the effect of the
redefinition will be to begin a process of
marginalization for many churches and their clergy who
currently participate in the civil registration of
marriage," said Bruce Clemenger of the Evangelical
Fellowship of Canada, an umbrella group for churches. 
Clemenger charged that by conceding the issue, the
government has allowed the court to unilaterally alter
"an institution of vital social significance." 
"Despite the existence of bills of rights in most
Western countries, not one has ruled that the
recognition of marriage as being the union of one man
and one woman to the exclusion of all others is
unconstitutional or in violation of any norm of human
rights," Clemenger said. 

The United Church of Canada, a mainline Protestant
church, has said it would perform ceremonies for
same-sex couples. 

Vancouver's Anglican bishop, Michael Ingham, has
allowed six of his parishes to perform ceremonies
blessing same-sex relationships, although the world's
national Anglican churches reaffirmed their rejection
of such blessings. 

Licenses now available 
The government's decision not to appeal the Ontario
ruling to the Supreme Court means the province can
continue issuing marriage licenses to same-sex
couples. 

Justice Minister Martin Cauchon said homosexuals in
other provinces must wait, but some constitutional
scholars believe they have a case for getting a
license now, the National Post reported. 

"It seems to me that someone in another province would
be able to get a court order on the basis that the
government is conceding," said Patrick Monahan, a
constitutional expert at Osgoode Hall Law School in 
Toronto. 

Toronto lawyer Martha McCarthy said if she had a
client in British Columbia or Manitoba, "I would be
slamming down the door of the city clerk's office to
make sure I got a license." 

Svend Robinson, a self-described homosexual member of
the House of Commons, predicted that with the support
of the federal cabinet, the bill will easily pass
Parliament. "I feel very proud as a Canadian to live
in a country that has sent such a clear signal to gay
and lesbian people," he said. 

As WorldNetDaily reported, Robinson has sponsored a
controversial bill that would add sexual orientation
as a protected category in Canada's genocide and hate
crimes legislation. A vote on the bill has been
delayed until the fall session of Parliament. 



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com