[faithandlife] IRAQ WAR II AND KOREA II SIMULTANEOUSLY? The Presidents prophetic words.

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : October 2002 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Charles Scott" <crscott@...>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:54:56 +0000
Brothers:

If my feeble memory serves, it wasn't too long ago that our chief
executive and Donald Rumsfeld, while drumming up support for war in the
Mid East, made comments about the axis of evil.  Didn't they mention
something over a dozen nations in the Axis of Evil?  When questioned
about whether we were going to fight all these wars at once,  Ari F.,
Mr. Rumsfeld, and General Franks replied we would prioritize and face
one at a time.

The Hubris with which they confidently spoke of "going it alone" in
those days is gone.  Thankfully, the President has been able to put
together something of some support from other nations.  He has moderated
his speech and now talks of getting multi-national support, and that war
is not inevitable.

However.  Since he threw down the gauntlet, perhaps it is too late to
avoid war.  Korea has stood up and confessed to developing atomic
weapons at a moment when we are looking toward Iraq.  The question now
is, do we really want to refight the Korean War?  The Indonesian
terrorists have taken a stand.  Do we want a two or three front war?
How about a dozen front war?  The listing of the states that allegedly
harbor and support terrorists only invited simultaneous uprising because
it doesn't take great insight to figure out we can't root out all the
evil doers in the world at the same time.

It becomes obvious that the new century could be as bloody as the last.
By putting out an "enemies list," by saying that we have the right to
strike first, our chief executive has accomplished part of what he
intended:  he has struck fear in the heart of his enemies.  That, of
course means that we are stuck with results of being feared.  One
predictable result is that people who fear us will strike out when we
are occupied with Iraq.

Reread these lines from the State of the Union address:
<snip>
"Our military has put the terror training camps of Afghanistan out of
business, yet camps still exist in at least a dozen countries.  A
terrorist underworld -- including groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic
Jihad, Jaish-i-Mohammed -- operates in remote jungles and deserts, and
hides in the centers of large cities.

While the most visible military action is in Afghanistan, America is
acting elsewhere.  We now have troops in the Philippines, helping to
train that country's armed forces to go after terrorist cells that have
executed an American, and still hold hostages.  Our soldiers, working
with the Bosnian government, seized terrorists who were plotting to bomb
our embassy.  Our Navy is patrolling the coast of Africa to block the
shipment of weapons and the establishment of terrorist camps in Somalia.

My hope is that all nations will heed our call, and eliminate the
terrorist parasites who threaten their countries and our own.  Many
nations are acting forcefully.  Pakistan is now cracking down on terror,
and I admire the strong leadership of President Musharraf.  (Applause.)

But some governments will be timid in the face of terror.  And make no
mistake about it:  If they do not act, America will.  (Applause.)

Our second goal is to prevent regimes that sponsor terror from
threatening America or our friends and allies with weapons of mass
destruction.  Some of these regimes have been pretty quiet since
September the 11th.  But we know their true nature.  North Korea is a
regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while
starving its citizens.

Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an
unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom.

Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support
terror.  The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax, and nerve gas,
and nuclear weapons for over a decade.  This is a regime that has
already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens --
leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children.  This is
a regime that agreed to international inspections -- then kicked out the
inspectors. This is a regime that has something to hide from the
civilized world.

States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of
evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.  By seeking weapons of
mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger.  They
could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match
their hatred.  They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the
United States.  In any of these cases, the price of indifference would
be catastrophic.

We will work closely with our coalition to deny terrorists and their
state sponsors the materials, technology, and expertise to make and
deliver weapons of mass destruction.  We will develop and deploy
effective missile defenses to protect America and our allies from sudden
attack.  (Applause.) And all nations should know:  America will do what
is necessary to ensure our nation's security.

We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side.  I will not wait on
events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws
closer and closer.  The United States of America will not permit the
world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most
destructive weapons.  (Applause.)

Our war on terror is well begun, but it is only begun.  This campaign
may not be finished on our watch -- yet it must be and it will be waged
on our watch."
<snip>

------------------------------------------

I am not saying that we should have made no response to 911.  You wil
recall I approved of many of the president's actions, and withheld for a
long time any critical statements about moves that made me uneasy.
In the state of the union speech he named several countries.  Donald
Rumsfeld and other spokes persons have named others.

These words have a prophetic quality.  They call into existence a
fulfillment.  Countries such as Korea, Iran, and Iraq who have nothing
in common, suddenly have something in common:  fear of a powerful enemy
who has promised war.

If there wasn't an "axis of evil" before the State of the Union speech,
it has now been called into existence.  Some things are better left
unsaid.  We shouldn't meditate on evil, for sufficient for the day is
the evil thereof.

We were attacked and responded , and that was good.

It was good that our President left some of the rhetoric behind as he
went to the UN to call on world support.  But the words that were said
are out there, resonating around the world, and we probably haven't
heard the last echo.

Who is up for a simultaneous war in Iran, Iraq, Korea, Indonesia, Libya,
Syria and the rest of the "Axis of Evil?"

Charles Scott





_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp