Whatever.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Pierce [mailto:revcdp@...]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:58 AM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] An Appeal
I'm rather perplexed. As someone who was originally added to the list as a
by-product of the GC in Orlando, I thought the purpose of this list was so
that both sides could get to know one another better through honest and
manly exchange. That you desire to disengage over the pursuit of an honest
answer is rather unfortunate.
That said if honest and manly exchange is out of bounds...then there is
little purpose in it, isn't there? Tell me if I'm wrong. Furthermore, what
does that say about our two jurisdictions drawing nearer? Are we going to
hear..."perhaps there is an alternative" each time that there is even minor
disagreement? What sort of ecclesiastical marriage is that?
Every blessing,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Ward [mailto:mward@...]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:33 AM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] An Appeal
Johann+
Perhaps an alternate list-serve would be appropriate (for either one)?
MLW+
-----Original Message-----
From: The Rev. Fr. Johann W. Vanderbijl III [mailto:cranmer@...]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:20 AM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: Re: [FaithandLife] An Appeal
I must say that I used to enjoy this list simply because of the camaraderie
and the mutually edifying messages. It seems to me it has become a
battlefield akin to the late War of Puritan Aggression. I am very close to
asking to be removed from it.
Besides, there's work to be done out there...satan is dragging souls to hell
and all we can do is sit behind our computers all day long bashing each
other. Something is wrong with this picture...don't see much of Jesus in
it, I'm afraid.
Johann+
The Rev. Fr. Johann W. Vanderbijl III, Rector
The Anglican Church of St. George the Martyr, R.E.
427 Batesville Road
Simpsonville, SC 29681
cranmer@...
www.stgeorge-re.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Ward" <mward@...>
To: <faithandlife@...>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] An Appeal
Brothers+
Can't we please just let this sort of stuff alone? Can't we stop calling
one another "crypto-Zwinglians" or "crypto-Romanist" or anything else? Or
at least implying it, if not directly making those charges?
Please?
There really hasn't been much of edification on this list for months.
MLW+
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Pierce [mailto:revcdp@...]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:42 AM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: RE: [FaithandLife] Zwinglian Zahl
So what about substantiating your charges against Dr. Zahl?
Chris Pierce
Somerville, NJ
-----Original Message-----
From: GMSpencer@... [mailto:GMSpencer@...]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:07 AM
To: faithandlife@...
Subject: Re: [FaithandLife] Zwinglian Zahl
In a message dated 8/28/05 11:41:38 PM, drew.collins@... writes:
> of course (and I'm not accusing you of
> this), some Anglo-Catholics have falsely charged Crammer with being a
> Zwinglian as well. Shoot, Gordon was falsely accused me of being a
> Zwinglian!
>
--
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: faithandlife-unsubscribe@...