Well enough, Laud might have been portrayed as a crypto Papist...but what I wish to know is whether or not the account is true?  Did he really behave publicly at the Lord's Board in the manner in which the account was set forth?

I will wade through the piece on the Justus website.  Laudy, laudy what a man he must've been...anyway, what was his lodger's name?

<<The quote sent is one of many that attempted to portray Laud as a 
crypto-Papist, secretly more Roman than the Romans!>>


>