[futurebasic] Re: [FB] Globals too big?

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : August 1999 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Joe Lewis Wilkins <PepeToo@...>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 11:21:54 -0700
Don't worry Paul. Phil probably looked at the Get Info Size (always 97k on HFS
docs), and didn't look at the number of bytes - which shows the "actual size". I
surmise!

Joe Wilkins

Paul Bruneau wrote:

> Is that the size of the text file, which might include constants?
>
> If not, then does that include arrays? They are not included in the
> limitation because they go into the app heap I think.
>
> If none of the above, then I don't know what the heck, because
> everything points to 64k limit of simple and record globals, no matter
> how many global files one might split them into.
>
> Just when I thought I had all the answers, too! :)
>
> PB
>
> Phil Yates wrote:
> >
> > > Is it wrong to have some 20k global record variables? I've been using
> > > several 10k ones for a long time with no ill effect, but I've had to
> > > enlarge them to hold more stuff.
> >
> > This probably won't help you in the slightest, but after reading your EMail, I
> > checked the size of the Globals file on my PACT program.
> >
> > 96K.
> >
> > Works fine. And this is NOT a case of "mine is bigger than yours."
> >
> > So the problem lies somewhere else.
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>