[futurebasic] RE: [FB] "Genuine compiler"

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : September 2000 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Edwards, Waverly" <wedwards@...>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 16:07:27 -0400
Someone call the fire department, break out the hoses.  I feel a firestorm
coming on.  I'll take your word for it Geoff.

I dont have my flame retardant clothes or glasses.  I feel a hot discussion
being started. 

Please, I'll take your word for it.  

W.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bancroft [mailto:peter@...]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 15:58
To: futurebasic@...; Ken Shmidheiser
Subject: Re: [FB] "Genuine compiler"


At 10:11 AM -0500 11/9/00, Geoff Perlman wrote:

>One of our engineers rewrote a fractal program in REALbasic that he had
>originally written in C and compiled with CodeWarrior. By optimizing his
>REALbasic code, he was able to get the fractal program to execute faster
>than the version written in C and compiled with CodeWarrior.

Can you prove that?

What does optimisation mean here - insertion of machine code?

Peter           mailto:peter@...



--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>