>... all of which is reassuring (I think), but the
>"`0xA193,0x225F,0x22C8,0x2280" part still looks rather daunting. Need we
>know anything about it?

Ted,

That is just the hex for the 68K version of the call. You don't even need
it for compiling in PPC, which makes adding the missing call pretty easy,
if you know the parameters and result.

But, if you do a fat compile, it will call you on it if the hex codes
aren't there too.

Robert