[futurebasic] Re: [FB] print record definition?

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : September 2001 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: jonathan <jonnnathan@...>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:24:13 +0200
le 2001/09/07 1:30, Alain Pastor à apastor@... a écrit :

> I would try this instead:
[snip and a half]

apart from the fact that you've been drinking too much wine again alain,
particularly inadvisable when playing tennis, this is so complete that i'm
lost! i was working from a version of thinkref dating from around 1886, so i
expected the info to have changed slightly [i believed that the record size
would be the same, but that the field content would have changed]

it looks like you have translated all the headers so i will have to pick
through and look for just the print record, but what is better: to put in in
morceaux, like you do, or to have it all in one record, like i tried?

i can imagine the advantage of the cutup approach if the particular
[sub]records were reused elsewhere, other than that...

would you care to educate me on this matter?

:-j

ps. can't find your revised dragmanager stuff, can you backchannel it to me
directly.

pps. for our north american friends: no, the dragmanager is not a guide to
dressing up for men who think different.