Thanks all for your input on Jaguar.
I picked up a copy.  I could find little difference in look and feel
but there were definitely new features, many unexplored.

What was very disheartening was that the same program that ran under
10.1.3(?) died miserably under Jaguar.  I spent countless ***hours***
picking at the craziest minutiae trying to track down crashes.
When I got it to run under Jaguar it crashed on 10.1.3.  
It took forever and two days to finally get it to work under both
versions of the OS.

I have one thing to say -- if you don't have Jaguar, get it.


W.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Lewis Wilkins [mailto:PepeToo@...]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:40 PM
To: futurebasic@...
Subject: Re: [FB] Do I need Jaguar


If I'm not mistaken,  there was a big change in the Developer tools with 
10.2, particularly Apple Script Studio, and the new versions only run on 
10.2 or later; so I'd say you need to go up. I did. BTW, there's a 5 
pack for $189 from most places. That's only $40 per. You can't beat that.

Joe Wilkins

Edwards, Waverly wrote:

>I was talking with Staz the other day and showed him a program.
>My program didn't work on his machine but worked perfectly well
>on my own (10.1.4).
>
>Is 10.2 such as different beast that I *need* to purchase it.
>I already have, I just haven't opened the box.  I don't need any
>new features but if its really such a different environment then 
>I guess I'll install it.
>
>I'm not cool with having to fork out another $130 for what appears
>to be a minor or feature upgrade.
>
>
>W.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>
>
>
>  
>



--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>