Ken,

I'm just not experiencing the crashes you are with OS X, but then I do 
make sure I do regular maintenance on my machines (but I also did this 
with OS 9), and I did a "Clean Install" with Jaguar.  These are 
development machines also, not web servers.

I can agree with you on the time differential for running DiskWarrior 
on OS X vs. OS 9 thought.  I ran it last night, starting about 7:00 
p.m., and it didn't complete until about 2:30 this morning.

Don't know if you saw this, but DiskWarrior 3 preorders are being taken 
at:

http://alsoft.com/DiskWarrior/diskwarrior3info.html

They do say there has been a dramatic speed improvement.  I hope it's 
true.


On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 06:58  AM, Ken Shmidheiser wrote:

> As far as I'm concerned, you might as well not bother with OS X unless 
> you have DiskWarrior and a Classic bootable system around to repair 
> it-- at least until DiskWarrior ships its promised OS X bootable 
> version. And even then, what took DiskWarrior five minutes to do under 
> Class, takes 6 hours under OS X.
>
----
Scott Spencer
SJ3
sj3@...