Ken:

>>2. Why is the aforementioned Application icon suite incomplete when
>>viewed in the icns Browser (mentioned above)? Or do you know that it
>>is? Or does this not matter? And, if it doesn't matter, then why are
>>the missing icons positions there? If we are to use the FBPackager as
>>a templet, then shouldn't it have all the icons as suggested by the
>>the icns Browser?
>
>That's more a question for Robert C.

My short answer it that if one leaves out an icon, then another is 
scaled to take it's place. So if you want something to scale your 
icons and are willing to live with that, then leave some out -- or 
least, that's my understanding.

tedd

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com/