[futurebasic] Re: [FB] re: clang as replacement for gcc

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : July 2009 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Brian Stevens <bstevens33@...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:56:58 -0700
On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:45 AM, H. Gluender wrote:
>
> Now, as far as I remember, with compilers there is a performance  
> tradeoff concerning speed and tightness of the resulting code. How  
> does GCC and Clang compare with this respect?
Yes, I'm also interested to see more details with respect to  
optimization and dead code removal.

> Could you please tell me what "pch time" means?
pch = pre-compiled headers.


Brian S