[futurebasic] re: Optimization level

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : October 2009 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "H. Gluender" <h@...>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:12:18 +0200
According to RP's valuable investigations and results:

                        compile    size     run
-O0 None                6.80    631 KB    1.20
-O1 Fast               11.24    508 KB    0.73
-O2 Faster             15.44    520 KB    0.68
-O3 Fastest            17.02    532 KB    0.68
-Os Fastest, smallest  15.23    479 KB    0.71
-Oz Smallest           15.54    422 KB    0.74

... I should like to propose to rename "Fastest, smallest" as "Fast & 
small" in future versions of FBtoC.


Bernie replied:

"But isn't "Fastest, Smallest" the term used by the gcc compiler?"


Hi Bernie,

you are kindly encouraged to interpret my suggestion also as a minor 
critique of FBtoC's slider-adjustment of the compiler optimization.

;-)

Best
-- 

                   Herbie

          ------------------------
          <http://www.gluender.de>