Peter sed:

>The can of worms is the Handleevents itself. No other topic has raised so
>much discussion over the last few years. Everyone has their own way of
>using it!
>
-snip-
>
>I still like the idea of plugins as a way of extending common code.
>
>Peter		mailto:peter@...		http://www.isoma.com

Peter et al:

I don'r really see why anyone is talking about HANDLEEVENTS. Ouside of
placing a HANDLEEVENTS inside an include file, I don't see HANDLEEVENTS as
a problem for making add-on code in the form of includes. Is there
something I'm not getting here?

tedd

PS: IMHO, there is just one proper way to use HANDLEEVENTS and that is to
have just one per program. It's always worked for me.

___________________________________________________________________
<mailto:tedd@...>	               http://sperling.com/