up in sac - folsom - in northen cal :) is this the "iggy" i knew from postmodern theology group? pax jok --- iggy <iggy@...> wrote: > Welcome!!!! > > Were in Californication are you? (RHCP inside joke) > > I just moved from Monterey area to Billings a while > ago. Out there I was > ultra conservative, Here I'm almost a liberal! > hahahah! It will be good to > have some one else take some of the heat that I have > been while on the forum > Everyone is great, don't take anyone to serious if > they go after you. You > will learn much in the discussions here. > > You sound a bit unorthadox (no opun intended) yet, > we try things we learn, > we grow. > One church I went to the singles would record > "Friends" and watch it after > their Bible study. You know what? PEOPLE SHOWED > UP!!! > > Living in the land where you plug your car in so it > will start in the > morning, > > iggy > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > From: pastorsforum@... > Date: 01/29/04 14:32:55 > To: pastorsforum@... > Subject: Re: [PastorsForum] Gods teachings on > tattoos/piercings > > actually, if you keep reading it says, "for the dead > or other gods." > > also - scripture many times calls for a "slave to > put > his ear to the door and peirce." God says that he > will "tattoo His name" on our hands - the word is > the > same as in lev. > > more so, do you cut your beard? do you shave the > sides of your hair? just a few lines up God says > not > to - :) just wondering > > pax > jok > > > --- Pastor Hughes <embc@...> wrote: > > John Okeefe wrote: > > > > ; i like "altarative music" and > > that is way out in many churhces; i have a tattoo > > and > > both my ears are peireced (with gage) - none of > that > > is against God's teachings, but many churches > would > > not accpet me for my outside look - never gettign > to > > know that inside i am a follower of the one true > God > > - > > > > Word of Caution.....the article and info below is > > not off > > of ginkworld and is very conservative .... > > please read with extreme caution...as tatoo > removal] > > is costly and can be somewhat painful.... :) > > > > > > heres a few thoughts on the above subject ENJOY > > > > WHAT ABOUT LEVITICUS 19:28? > > > > Leviticus 19:28 is the Christian (or > so-called > > Christian?) tattooist and tattoo-bearer's worst > > nightmare. The Lord plainly, clearly, strongly, > and > > without a doubt - condemns the tattoo. > > > > Ye shall not make any cuttings in your > flesh > > for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am > the > > LORD. > > Leviticus 19:28 > > > > Could that be any more clear? > > > > "Ye shall not. . .print any marks upon you. > . > > ." > > > > Simple. . . Straightforward. . .Settled. . . > > > > God Said It. . . I Believe It. . . That > > Settles It. . . > > > > Right. . .? > > > > Not hardly. . . > > > > The clear statement from the word of God > does > > not settle anything for this generation of > > disobedient, carnal, worldy, tolerant, > > non-judgmental, Christians. Rather than obey God, > > they run miles and miles and miles to "justify" > > their open disobedience to the Word of God. > > > > How do they get around Leviticus 19:28? > > > > Clearly, there it is. "Ye shall not. . > .print > > any marks upon you. . ." > > > > A lot of Christians when confronted with > > Leviticus 19:28, scream, "Hey dude, that's not for > > today. Man, that's the Old Testament. I'm under > the > > New Testament". > > > > Did you know that "bestiality" (sicko, > > perverted, sex with an animal) was ONLY forbidden > in > > the Old Testament Levitical Law? Only in Leviticus > > 18:23 and Leviticus 20:15-16. Dude, only in the > Old > > Testament Law. Does that mean a Holy God NOW - > under > > the New Testament, approves of bestiality? > > > > By the way, have you ever read Leviticus > > 19:29? The verse immediately AFTER the "it's not > for > > me" Leviticus 19:28? > > > > Do not prostitute thy daughter, to cause > her > > to be a whore; lest the land fall to whoredom, and > > the land become full of wickedness. > > Leviticus 19:29 > > > > This is the only place in the Bible that God > > directly forbids someone to prostitute their > > daughter. And since, it's ONLY in the Old > Testament > > Levitical Law (and "hey, dude, we're NOT under the > > law") - it MUST be ok by the Lord for a parent to > > cause their daughter to prostitute. > > > > Same sick, perverted, wicked, line of > > reasoning as the "it's ONLY in the Old > > Testament-tattoo-bearer-wearer". Same reasoning. . > . > > Same disobedience. . . Same perversion of the Word > > of God. > > > > There are many other "moral laws' that are > > ONLY forbidden in the Old Testament, such as the > > human sacrifice of children. No where in the New > > Testament is this forbidden. Does that mean that > NOW > > under the New Testament, God Almighty endorses > > throwing babies into the fire as a human > sacrifice? > > > > And thou shalt not let any of thy seed > pass > > through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou > > profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD. > > Leviticus 18:21 > > > > Matthew Henry's Commentary at the beginning > of > > Leviticus 19 explains that most of Leviticus 19 > > (such as verse 19:28) are moral commandments that > > applies not only for Israel but for the New > > Testament Christian today. > > > > "Some ceremonial precepts there are in > this > > chapter, but most of them are moral. . . Most of > > these precepts are binding on us, for they are > > expositions of most of the ten commandments." > > (Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole > > Bible, Leviticus 19:28) > > > > IT'S ONLY "FOR THE DEAD" > > > > But by far the Christian tattooers favorite > > excuse for disobeying Leviticus 19:28 is the "that > > means nor print any marks upon you - for the > DEAD". > > It's ok, as long it's not for the dead". See the > > "for the dead!!! . .for the dead!!!!". > > > > Is it ok to practice satanic bloodletting, > > self mutilation or cutting of the flesh as long as > > it's not for the dead? It's in the same verse. . . > > Hmmm. . .? > > > > Ye shall not make any cuttings in your > flesh > > for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am > the > > LORD. > > Leviticus 19:28 > > > > Notice also, the phrase "for the dead" is > ONLY > > referencing the "cuttings in your flesh". The > > condemnation of "nor print ANY marks upon you" is > > not qualified by the phrase "for the dead". Also, > if > > you'll notice the verse clearly says "ANY marks" > > period. > > > > Merrill F. Unger's, very popular and > > authoritative, Unger's Bible Dictionary under the > > definition for "Mark" includes the following > > reference for Leviticus 19:28: > > > > "In Lev. 19:28 we find two prohibitions of > > an unnatural disfigurement of the body: 'Ye shall > > not make any cutting in your flesh for the dead, > nor > > any print any marks upon you.' The latter (Heb. qa > > aqa, incision) refers to tattooing, and has no > > reference to idolatrous usages, but was intended > to > > inculcate upon the Israelietes a proper reverence > > for God's creation." > > (Merrill F. Unger, Unger's Bible > Dictionary, > > 1974 ed., p. 696) > > > > Notice that Unger teaches that tattoos were > > forbidden without any reference to pagan, heathen, > > or idolatrous usages. In other words, the tattoo > > itself, regardless the reason, was forbidden. > Amen. > > Brother Unger. > > > > Wycliffe's Bible Encyclopedia under the > > definition for TATTOOING distinctly says: > > > > "While 'cuttings in the flesh' have > > reference here to mourning customs [for the dead], > > the tattooing does not appear to pertain to such > > practice." > > (Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia, 1975 ed., p. > > 1664) > > > > The New American Commentary on Leviticus > 19:28 > > writes the condemnation was for, "cutting the body > > either for the dead or with tattoo marks." (Mark > F. > > Rooker, The New American Commentary on Leviticus, > > 2000 ed., p. 262) Explicitly recognizing the > tattoo > > was not "for the dead." > > > > Do you see how dishonest and disobedient > this > > "it doesn't apply to my > > New-Testament-Christian-marked-for-Jesus-tattoo" > is? > > Find what you don't like in the Word of God, cut > it > > out (doesn't apply to New Testament Christians) or > > misapply (it's just for the DEAD, when it's > clearly > > NOT). Same tactics used by the satanic cults and > > heretics for years. You can prove anything and > > everything with such deceitful methods. > > > > THE "FORBIDDEN" HAIRCUT > > > > One of the silliest and childish arguments > to > > justify the Christian tattoo is the: "Hey man, do > > you get a haircut or trim your beard? God > condemned > > getting a haircut or trimming your beard in the > > verse before forbidding the tattoo. Dude, the > tattoo > > is the same as getting a haircut." > > > > Believe it or not . . . this is a widely > used > > argument. > > > > Leviticus 19:26-28 is a clear condemnation > of > > pagan, witchcraft and heathen practices. Look at > the > > context. Verse 26 is plainly referring to > > "enchantment [spells or witchcraft] nor observe > > times [astrology]. . . Verse 28 is the pagan, > > demonic practice of bloodletting [cuttings in your > > flesh] and tattooing. Why would the Lord stick in > > the middle a verse that "condemns simply getting a > > haircut"? Of course, He wouldn't. . . And He > didn't. > > . . > > > > Leviticus 19:26-28 reads: > > 26 Ye shall not eat any thing with the > > blood: neither shall ye use enchantment, nor > observe > > times. > > 27 Ye shall not round the corners of your > > heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy > > beard. > > 28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your > > flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: > I > > am the LORD. > > > > The condemnation found in verse 27 of > > "rounding the corners of your head" or "mar the > > corners of thy beard" was the forbidding of a > common > > pagan practice that cut the hair as worship and > > honor of the hosts of heaven. > > > > Here's how Matthew Henry's and Coffman's > > Commentaries reflect on the "forbidden haircut" of > > Leviticus 19:27: > > > > "Those that worshipped the hosts of > heaven, > > in honour of them, cut their hair so as that their > > heads might resemble the celestial globe; but, as > > the custom was foolish itself, so, being done with > > respect to their false gods, it was idolatrous." > > (Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, > > Leviticus 19:27) > > > > "Herodotus tells of the use of this type > of > > haircut, forming what is called a tonsure, as the > > practice of pagan religious cults of ancient times > > who did so honoring one of their gods." > > (Coffman Commentaries on the Old and New > > Testament, Leviticus 19:27) > > > > The fact is. . . Up until a few years ago, > > virtually everyone, including the most liberal > > Christian, KNEW the tattoo was clearly forbidden > by > > the Word of God. And throughout history, the > tattoo > > has ALWAYS been condemned by Bible Believing > > Christians. Always. Every historical resource ever > > written on tattoos clearly confirms this fact. > > > > "Just as occurred in other cultures with > > tattoo traditions, when these pagan tribes were > > 'converted' to the Christian religion, their > > spiritual and cultural rites (which included > > tattooing, piercing and scarification) were > > outlawed. . ." > > (Jean-Chris Miller, The Body Art Book : A > > Complete, Illustrated Guide to Tattoos, Piercings, > > and Other Body Modifications, p.9) > > > > "Whenever missionaries encountered > tattooing > > they eradicated it." > > (Gilbert, Steve, Tattoo History: A Source > > Book, p. 101) > > > > "While these and other body modifications > > continued to be practiced underground as a way for > > non-Christian people to identify each other, God > > forbid you got caught and your mark was revealed." > > (Jean-Chris Miller, The Body Art Book : A > > Complete, Illustrated Guide to Tattoos, Piercings, > > and Other Body Modifications, p.11) > > > > Up until a few years, virtually every > > commentary written understood Leviticus 19:28 as > an > > open condemnation of the tattoo. The Christian > > acceptance of a tattoo was not even considered for > > serious discussion. > > > > Jameison-Faussett-Brown Commentary and > > Explanatory on the Whole Bible writes under > > Leviticus 19:28 > > > > "nor print any marks upon you-by > tattooing, > > imprinting figures of flowers, leaves, stars, and > > other fanciful devices on various parts of their > > person. The impression was made sometimes by means > > of a hot iron, sometimes by ink or paint, as is > done > > by the Arab females of the present day and the > > different castes of the Hindus. It it probable > that > > a strong propensity to adopt such marks in honor > of > > some idol gave occasion to the prohibition in this > > verse; and they were wisely forbidden, for they > were > > signs of apostasy; and, when once made, they were > > insuperable obstacles to a return." > > (Jameison-Faussett-Brown Commentary and > > Explanatory on the Whole Bible, Leviticus 19:28) > > > > James M. Freeman in his excellent book, The > > New Manners & Customs of the Bible, says of > > Leviticus 19:28: > > > > "Tattooing Forbidden > > Both cutting and tattooing were done by > the > > heathens, and so God forbade His people from doing > > so in imitation of them." > > (James M. Freeman, The New Manners & > Customs > > of the Bible, 1998 edition, p. 157) > > > > Coffman's Commentary on the Old and New > > Testament under Leviticus 19:18 says: > > > > "The cutting of one's flesh also > > characterized pagan worship as attested by the > > priests of Baal on Mount Carmel in the contest > with > > Elijah. Tattooing was also a device of paganism. . > . > > Christians generally disapprove of tattooing, > > despite the fact of the widespread use of it by > many > > even today. In the light of what God says here, > and > > in view of the history of it, it seems strange > that > > anyone would pay someone else to tattoo him." > > (Coffman's Commentaries on the Old and New > > Testament, Leviticus 19:28) > > > > Charles R. Erdman in his commentary on > > Leviticus 19:28 writes: > > > > "The custom of tattooing was forbidden, > > while among all the nations of antiquity it was > > common." (Charles R. Erdman, The Book of > Leviticus, > > 1951 ed., p.93) > > > > But Naves famous Topical Bible puts it best. > > Under the topic "Tattooing", Nave's simply and > > bluntly writes: "TATTOOING, forbidden, Lev. 19;28" > > (Nave's Topical Bible, p. 1312) > > > > BUT WHAT ABOUT ISAIAH 44:5 & EZEKIEL 9:4? > > > > I've seen several references by Christian > > tattooers who claim Isaiah 44 and Ezekiel 9 are > > examples of God-ordained tattoos in the Bible. > > > > And the LORD said unto him, Go through the > > midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, > > and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that > > sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be > > done in the midst thereof. > > Ezekiel 9:4 > > > > One shall say, I am the Lord's; and > another > > shall call himself by the name of Jacob; and > another > > shall subscribe with his hand unto the LORD, and > > surname himself by the name of Israel. > > Isaiah 44:5 > > > > The following excellent explanation of > Isaiah > > 44:5 and Ezekiel 9:4 came from a Jewish web site: > > > > 1) In Leviticus 19:28 the term used is > > "k'thoveth qa'aqa." "K'thoveth" means "writing or > > inscription." "Qa'aqa" comes from a root whose > > meaning is "to insert or to stick in." Together, > > "writing that is stuck in"(see Rashi's commentary > on > > the verse). Jewish oral tradition explains that > the > > verse is talking about what we refer to today as > > tattoos, i.e. scratching or piercing the skin and > > filling it in with pigment.(see the tractate > > "Makoth" 21a). > > 2) Isaiah 44:5 uses the word "yichtov" > which > > means "will write" without the word "qa'a'qa" "to > > insert or to stick in." Isaiah is not talking > about > > tattoos. What he is saying is "...and he will > write > > with his hand to the L-rd..." like someone who > signs > > a contract to express his utmost commitment and > > obligation(see Metzudath David's commentary on the > > verse). > > > > 3) Ezekiel 9:4 uses the word "tav" which > > means "a mark or a sign." The man clothed with > linen > > is going to mark the foreheads of the righteous > with > > ink, not tattoo them! > > > > Someone who read the verses (Isaiah 44:5 > and > > Ezekiel 9:4) in the Hebrew original would never > > dream that they are referring to tattoos. > > > (www.geocities.com/mnlerner2000/let007.html, > > used with permission) > > > > THE "TATTOOED" LORD JESUS CHRIST. . . > > > > Some Christian tattooers go so far as claim > > that the Lord Jesus Christ has a tattoo! > > > > Many Christian tattooers claim that when the > > Lord Jesus Christ returns in Revelation chapter 19 > > on a horse - He has a tattoo on his thigh! > > > > Revelation 19:11-16 says: > > 11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a > > white horse; and he that sat upon him was called > > Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth > > judge and make war. > > 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and > on > > his head were many crowns; and he had a name > > written, that no man knew, but he himself. > > 13 And he was clothed with a vesture > dipped > > in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. > > 14 And the armies which were in heaven > > followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine > > linen, white and clean. > > 15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp > sword, > > that with it he should smite the nations: and he > > shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he > treadeth > > the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of > > Almighty God. > > 16 And he hath on his vesture and on his > > thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF > > LORDS. > > > > > > I know you don't believe Christians can be > > that deceived so here's the proof: > > > > "And what of Christ Himself? Twice in > > chapter 19, our Lord is depicted as having a name > > written on Him (verses 12 and 16). As unthinkable > as > > it may be for some to picture our Lord Jesus as > > having a tattoo, the author of the Apocalypse had > no > > problem with it." > > (www.larryoverton.com/berean/tatoos.htm) > > > > Revelation 19:16 clearly is referring to the > > "vesture his thigh" - ". . .he hath on his vesture > > and on his thigh. . ." > > > > Can anyone with any spiritual discernment > (and > > a brain) really believe the Lord Jesus Christ has > a > > tattoo? Isn't it amazing how spiritually blind > > someone becomes when they began to justify their > > disobedience to the Word of God? > > > > But what really is frightening about this > > gross, perverted, wicked interpretation of a > > "tattooed" Jesus Christ in Revelation 19:16 - it > > makes the Lord Jesus Christ a SINNER! > > > > It means the Lord Jesus CLEARLY disobeyed > > Leviticus 19:28! It means the Lord Jesus Christ > was > > not Holy! He was not the sinless, spotless Lamb of > > God. He clearly was disobedient and broke the > > Leviticual Law of Leviticus 19:28! > > > > And if the Lord Jesus Christ committed sin - > > everyone is either in hell or on the way to hell. > > There is no salvation without a sinless, spotless > > Lamb of God. It took a sinless, perfect, Saviour > to > > pay for your sins. > > > > And thank God - despite what these > spiritually > > sicko, perverted, Christian tattooers "preach" - > The > > Lord Jesus Christ was without sin - and without > > "tattoo"! > > > > 18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not > > redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and > > gold, from your vain conversation received by > > tradition from your fathers; > > 19 But with the precious blood of Christ, > as > > of a lamb without blemish and without spot: > > 1 Peter 1:18-19 > > > > For we have not an high priest which > cannot > > be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; > but > > was in all points tempted like as we are, yet > > without sin. > > Hebrews 4:15 > > > > For he hath made him to be sin for us, who > > knew no sin; that we might be made the > righteousness > > of God in him. > > 2 Corinthians 5:21 > > > > 21 For even hereunto were ye called: > because > > Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an > example, > > that ye should follow his steps: > > 22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found > > in his mouth: > > 1 Peter 2:21-22 > > > > 4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth > > also the law: for sin is the transgression of the > > law. > > 5 And ye know that he was manifested to > take > > away our sins; and in him is no sin. > > 1 John 3:4-5 > > > > DEFILING THE TEMPLE OF THE LIVING GOD > > > > Most Christians, even the most carnal and > > backslidden, would never desecrate or defile the > > local church building. Even among most lost people > > there is a reverence and sacredness to the church > > building. > > > > But. . . Did you know? > > > > If you are truly born again the Holy Spirit > of > > God dwells within in (John 14:17, Romans 8:9, 11) > > and your body is the temple of God. 1 Corinthians > > 6:19-20 makes this very clear. > > > > 19 What? know ye not that your body is the > > temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye > > have of God, and ye are not your own? > > 20 For ye are bought with a price: > therefore > > glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, > which > > are God's. > > 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 > > > > And . . . Did you know? > > > > The Lord warns several times of the > > seriousness of defiling the temple of God - your > > body! In 1 Corinthians 3, the Lord clearly and > > sternly warns against defiling your body - the > > temple of God. If any man defiles the temple of > God > > - HIM SHALL GOD DESTROY! > > > > 16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of > > God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? > > 17 If any man defile the temple of God, > him > > shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, > > which temple ye are. > > 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 > > > > My Christian friend, you'd better watch what > > you do with your body. It is the temple of a Holy > > God. You'd better not defile it with pagan, > > devil-worshipping tattoos! > > > > ". . . If any man defile the temple of God, > > him shall God destroy. . ." > > > > What God said - He meant! > > > > God is not a man, that he should lie; > > neither the son of man, that he should repent: > hath > > he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he > spoken, > > and shall he not make it good? > > Numbers 23:19 > > > > 7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for > > whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. > > 8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of > > the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to > the > > Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. > > Galatians 6:7-8 > > > > Do you really believe the Lord Jesus Christ > is > > pleased with a Christian wearing a pagan tattoo? > Do > > you honestly believe God's perfect will is for a > > Christian, any Christian, to be "marked" with a > > demonic tattoo? > > > > With the unbiased documentation and Bible > > we've given (and we could supply much, much more) > > there is no question to the pagan and > > devil-worshipping source of the tattoo. Every > tattoo > > historian I've read, traces the root of the tattoo > > to religious paganism. Every one. > > > > 2 Corinthians 6:14-17 is another warning > > against the tattoo. Notice the warning against the > > "fellowshipping" and concord with Christ and > Belial > > (the devil). Verse 16 is very interesting. . . As > it > > relates the "fellowshipping" with your body - the > > temple of the living God. > > > > 2 Corinthians 6:14-17 reads: > > 14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with > > unbelievers: for what fellowship hath > righteousness > > with unrighteousness? and what communion hath > light > > with darkness? > > 15 And what concord hath Christ with > Belial? > > or what part hath he that believeth with an > infidel? > > 16 And what agreement hath the temple of > God > > with idols? for ye are the temple of the living > God; > > as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk > in > > them; and I will be their God, and they shall be > my > > people. > > 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and > > be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the > > unclean thing; and I will receive you, > > I realize in writing this, a lot of > Christians > > (or so-called Christians?) could care less what > God > > says. They're gonna do what they want to do - > > despite heaven or hell. But there are many > > Christians who want to serve God more than > anything > > - with ever fiber of their soul. I've talked to > > many, many Christians who were thinking about > > getting a tattoo. But after showing them the > satanic > > origin of the tattoo they realized a tattoo was > not > > the will of God. And it was for those "good and > > faithful servants" of the Lord Jesus Christ that > > this was written for. > > > > His lord said unto him, Well done, good > and > > faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a > few > > things, I will make thee ruler over many things: > > enter thou into the joy of thy lord. > > Matthew 25:23 > > > > Friend, God loves you and desires more than > > anything you love and obey Him. He desires first > of > > all obedience unto salvation by receiving the Lord > > Jesus Christ (John 1:12). And after salvation, His > > will for you is to serve and love Him with all you > > heart, body, mind and soul. > > > > You won't regret it! > > > > It'll be worth it one day! > > > > If you are truly a Christian and still have > > doubts about whether the tattoo is the perfect > will > > of God, go back through this article with an open > > Bible and an open hear. Prayerfully, look up the > > verses. And before you start, pray and ask the > Holy > > Spirit to "guide you into all truth" (John 16:13). > > > > 17 Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know > > these things before, beware lest ye also, being > led > > away with the error of the wicked, fall from your > > own stedfastness. > > 18 But grow in grace, and in the knowledge > > of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be > > glory both now and for ever. Amen. > > 2 Peter 3:17-18 > > > > > > > > HOpe you enjoyed this..... > > sorry so long...but most of my posts are short > > the above came off of bible believers.com > > > > Pastor Hughes > > East Mesa Baptist Church > > http://www.azboss.net/~embc/ > > > > > ===== > john o'keefe > http://www.ginkworld.net > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. > Try it! > http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ > > -- > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: > pastorsforum-unsubscribe@... > > "In essential things, unity; in non-essential > things, liberty; and in all > things, charity." > > ===== john o'keefe http://www.ginkworld.net __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/