[pastorsforum] RE: [PastorsForum] Baptist Stigma

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : May 2008 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: shieldwolf@...
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
Wow.  That last paragraph is the most interesting.  Again, I repeat. It's
a pretty picture, but it "must come from our gallery" seems to be a motto
that I am seeing.

So much for "One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism..."

I also like the assumption that churches must be autonomous.  I used to be
of that opinion.  They I read Acts 15 where the Jerusalem church made
policy for the church at Antioch (or perhaps some might call it a Synod). 
It's hard to get around that one. :)

Blessings,
Randy


> Since churches are (should be) autonomous the question to whether or not
> to
> accept the baptism of another denomination is a doctrinal issue. Therefore
> the choice belongs to the individual church to make.
>
>
>
> Some denominations, baptism is essential for salvation. Others it is
> because
> of salvation. Then we have those that it just does not matter. Not the
> mode,
> the reason but the fact it happened. Some require regenerated individuals
> only and from there it trickles to infants. Baptist have historically
> stood
> on the position of only those who have been regenerated and make a public
> profession are eligible and then only by immersion by a church who is
> doctrinally the same . . . or as it is stated of *like* faith.
>
>
>
> Being of like faith means that doctrinally we stand on the same doctrinal
> issues. Some denominations believe baptism imparts added grace - others do
> not hold to this belief. At the same time the question of whether or not
> salvation is eternal - once saved always saved or it is based upon ones
> ability to keep it or lose it.
>
>
>
> Being once saved eternally saved not based upon my ability to keep it but
> trusting God - I would not accept anyone's baptism from an other
> denomination where doctrinal differences on the essentials exist.
>
>
>
> Miguel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK.  I am talking about whether or not we would accept a Baptism as being
> "valid" or "acceptable" as Christian Baptism.  I am not saying that we
> agree
> with the concept that only those who are able to verbally express the
> desire
> should be baptized.
>
>
>
> Hopefully that gets us on the same page as to what I'm talking about.
>
>
>
> Blessings,
>
> Randy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Click here to join DoctrinalDebate
>
>
>
>
>
>                   Because of Calvary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                                 Pastor Miguel
>
>
>
>                          First Baptist Church of Olivehurst
>
>
>
>                        PO Box 578 - Olivehurst, CA 95961
>
>                  Church 530-743-1831 or Cell 530-701-5131
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                                 /}   Sword of the Spirit
>
> @##1611 KJV ###{ ]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
>
>                                 \}       Use it Daily!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    "Looking to the Future . . . Because People Matter!"
>
>
>
>              Jesus is the KING of Kings and LORD of Lords!
>
>
>
>                                   Preaching the Gospel
>
>
>
>                  Teaching the Word - Contending for truth
>
>
>
>                         Thank you for visiting our Web Page
>
>
>
>                              http://home.comcast.net/~fbco/
>
>
>
>                                    fbco@...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Click to join DoctrinalDebate
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To subscribe, send a message to: pastorsforum-join@...
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@...
>