Bro. Jerry, "Edition" is not the same as the original "version" or "translation" so I think it would be legit to call a reprinting and such, the same date as the original. I did like your statement about "defeating the darkness instead of debating the light." But caution and discernment must also be exercised here. Not all that claims to be light, is. (2 Cor. 11:14) David Warner -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Watts [mailto:robinwood@...] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:57 AM To: pastorsforum@... Subject: RE: [PastorsForum] Who is the aggressor ? Okay...I have not posted on this subject....My "Doctors" certificate (from Seminary) has on it "KJV 1611" and all my professor "hammered" this principle as "theology"---yet everytime they read the scripture it was the 1906-8 edition... Here's my question: Do we believe at the rapture that it will matter to our Lord (who gave His precious blood) which translation we read to "find forgiveness through the blood"?? The only "Inspired" writings are the original autographs...I wish we could spend more time defeating the darkness instead of debating the light....(that's my two sense worth---<GRIN>) Dr. Jerry N. Watts, Senior Pastor Robinwood Baptist Church Saucier, MS www.robinwoodbaptist.com 228-832-2727 -- To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@... "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and in all things, charity."