> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G. Reisinger [mailto:JREISINGER24@...]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 February 2007 2:29 AM
> To: soundofgrace@...
> Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Re: Anglican Church - Jack to Jeff Scanlan
> 
> (1)  When did Anglicans first  deliberately call themselves either
> "low" or "high" Anglicans?

From what I can understand they do not like those terms very much. It is,
apparently, possible to be high church, liturgical, etc., and still be very
evangelical. And there can be those who are anti-liturgy and be very
liberal.


> (2)  Also when did some Anglicans first use the phrase "Anglo-
> Catholics" and consider themselves the "Anglican branch of the
> Catholic church?"

Did not the Oxford movement push them in that direction? Remember John Henry
Newman? He was so high that he eventually went over to the RCC.


> (3)  I understand that the only one sticking point in merger talks is
> the refusal of Rome too accept the Anglican's ordination and demand a
> re-ordination.

Again I am speaking from only very vague knowledge but I would say there
would be more than that.


> (4)  When was the last open evangelical head of the Anglican church?
> It seems to me it was in the early 1960's.
> 


I think both Carey and Coggin did identify with evangelicalism at some stage
of their 'careers'.

God bless,
Jeff


 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/694 - Release Date: 20/02/2007
1:44 PM