Now, if I hold paedobaptism to be an errant doctrine (which I do) then it follows that if I agree with R.C.'s comments, I must consider him to be in sin because of that view and because he teaches it. So, for me to agree with R.C. -- by his own logic -- is to agree with a man who sins because of his doctrinal error. Do I sin if I do that? -- Ed H Dorrington wrote: > So who are the sinners, the premills or the post mills, or both? ;o) > > Harry > > */Carlo Rose <rosec007@...>/* wrote: > > That's what RC Sproul said in a recent podcast message. I know > this topic has come up in the past, that is, the question of > errors in doctrine being sinful. > > Here my summary of part of his message: > > Errors in doctrine are sinful. It is not only sin to hold a wrong > view, it is sin to teach a wrong view. > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20>