[soundofgrace] Re: [soundofgrace] Polygamy

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : November 2003 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Chad R. Bresson" <breusswane@...>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:08:09 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Reisinger" <jreisinger@...>
(3)  Polygamy is understood as a sin because the text says so in Genesis
2:24 and there
is no warrant for imposing discontinuity where there is none.


I would feel better if this were "the text implicitly says so" in Genesis
2:24 (one man/one woman excludes ANY and ALL other derivations for marriage
by implication) and there is no warrant for imposing discontinuity where
there is none.

Obviously, Genesis 2:24 does not use the word polygamy so the said truth is
an implied truth.

Chad Bresson
Xenia, OH