----- Original Message ----- From: "John Reisinger" <jreisinger@...> (3) Polygamy is understood as a sin because the text says so in Genesis 2:24 and there is no warrant for imposing discontinuity where there is none. I would feel better if this were "the text implicitly says so" in Genesis 2:24 (one man/one woman excludes ANY and ALL other derivations for marriage by implication) and there is no warrant for imposing discontinuity where there is none. Obviously, Genesis 2:24 does not use the word polygamy so the said truth is an implied truth. Chad Bresson Xenia, OH