Chad Richard Bresson wrote:
>  >(witness the recent,
> 
>  > "you haven't read the book" --> "yes, i have" conversation). 
> 
> This is exhibit A in completely misunderstanding what I was getting at.
> 
> I know Tom Wells (as do a few others on this list).  He lives just down 
> the road.  My comment was shorthand for... my understanding of what Tom 
> Wells (and Zaspel) was saying in NCT and Carlo’s understanding of what 
> Wells was saying are at odds.  IMHO, while there are some minor points 
> of departure, Wells is part of the “Reisinger” camp.
> 
> But no, I don’t have the time to go point by point through Wells and 
> Zaspel refuting the “irrefutable”, although I must say, I’ve been half 
> tempted to pay Tom a visit just to make sure I understand him correctly. :-)

There was no misunderstanding.  I was not addressing what you were 
"getting at."  I referenced the conversation of "you haven't read the 
book" and "yes, i have" as a means of pointing out that *one-line 
replies* are not beneficial.  I was not addressing the substance of your 
reply.

But this, your second response to my post, illustrates another point I 
made.  Rather than holding off on clicking Ye Olde Sende Button until 
you have made all the points necessary, you fired off your email and 
then quickly fired off another email shortly after it.  There is a 
four-post limit.  Many of your posts are second or third points that 
should have been made in one.
--
john-thomas