O-K... let's back up.  Where in Acts 8 is the suggestion that these
believers were rebaptized?  IOW, where's the support for suggestion that
these believers are exceptions to "unbaptized regenerates".  There is
evidence in the text that they are already regenerate (had received the word
of God) AND baptized (baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus).

It would seem your position amounts to an equivalence between the visible
baptism of the HS in Acts and regeneration.  Such a view is fraught with all
sorts of pitfalls.

Chad Bresson
Xenia, OH


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Fuchs (on MSN)" <SteveF_MS@...>
To: <soundofgrace@...>
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism


> Chad said, regarding Acts 8:
> "and notice that the moment the apostles realize that regeneration has
taken
> place, baptism occurs.  It should also be noted that the reason these are
> baptized is to place them into the visible church."
>
> Huh?
> I don't see in the text anything about placing them into the visible
church
> via baptism.
> There's an implicit recognition by the body of Christ, even those at a
> distance in Jerusalem, that these Samaritans were now brothers and
sisters,
> but baptism doesn't appear to be the connection.
>
> Instead it says:  "when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that
> Samaria had received the word of God"
>
> It reads as though they recognized them as siblings because they received
> the word of God, and so the apostles went to greet them, pray for them,
> testify and preach more of the word of the Lord to them.
>
> I'm not trying to drive a huge wedge between baptism and placement in the
> church, but I also want to be careful not to read more into the text than
is
> there.
> Their recognition by and fellowship with the visible body of Christ may
come
> as a result of baptism, but it does not appear to be the purpose of
> baptizing.
> The purpose appears to be immersing for the sake of cleansing.  It may
> produce or even symbolize ongoing involvement with the body, but it
doesn't
> read to me as the purpose.
>
> Grace,
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad Richard Bresson [mailto:breusswane@...]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:35 PM
> To: soundofgrace@...
> Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
>
>
> Acts 8:14 is an exception, despite the rule (unbaptized regenerates are
> foreign to scripture).  When everything else in scripture lays out a
> doctrine, an exception does not negate the doctrine, but is interpreted in
> light of the doctrine.  Scripture knows nothing of unbaptized
regenerates...
> and notice that the moment the apostles realize that regeneration has
taken
> place, baptism occurs.  It should also be noted that the reason these are
> baptized is to place them into the visible church.
>
> Chad Bresson
> Xenia, OH
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Fuchs (on MSN)" <SteveF_MS@...>
> To: <soundofgrace@...>
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 4:23 PM
> Subject: RE: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
>
>
> > Yes.
> >
> > OT shadows are reflections of reality to come, which give us language
> > and
> a
> > means to understand that which is spiritual and cannot be seen in the
> flesh.
> > NT acts of obedience are not shadows of the reality, but the physical
> > footsteps produced by it.  They represent and symbolize what's
> > happening, but not in a dark shadow, as if to be the reality
> > themselves.
> >
> > However, there is a human timing issue.
> > Doesn't scripture give example of those who were regenerate (or
> > seemingly
> > so) but not yet fully(?) baptized?
> >
> > Acts 8:14 Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that
> > Samaria
> had
> > received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, 15 who,
> > when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the
> > Holy
> Spirit.
> > 16 For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been
> > baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17 Then they laid hands on
> > them, and they received the Holy Spirit.
> >
> > So, I would say it this way:  the regenerate refusing baptism is
> > foreign
> to
> > scripture.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chad Richard Bresson [mailto:breusswane@...]
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 12:16 PM
> > To: soundofgrace@...
> > Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
> >
> >
> > Or put another way: the unbaptized regenerate is foreign to scripture.
> >
> > Chad
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chad Richard Bresson" <breusswane@...>
> > To: <soundofgrace@...>
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 3:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
> >
> >
> > > I would say regeneration is the "sign", the "washing" of Titus 3:5,
> > > and baptism is the sign of the sign because of its inseparable
> > > connection to repentance.
> > >
> > > Chad Bresson
> > > Xenia, OH
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Fuchs (on MSN)" <SteveF_MS@...>
> > > To: <soundofgrace@...>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 2:44 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
> > >
> > >
> > > > "It shows itself first and foremost, biblically, in baptism."
> > > >
> > > > But analogously, you could then say that the peace offering, or
> > > > sin offering, or the ceremonial washing is the sign of the shadow
> > > > covenant.
> > > Or
> > > > that 'repentance' is the sign of the new, because it occurs before
> > > baptism.
> > > >
> > > > The sign produces effects, and those effects themselves are
> > > > further
> > > evidence
> > > > of the reality, but they are not the sign proof of it.
> > > >
> > > > The changed heart is the sign proof, which produces first
> > > > repentance
> > > (which
> > > > isn't the sign either) and then baptism, and many other things.
> > > >
> > > > You can't fake flesh circumcision, and you can't fake heart
> > circumcision,
> > > > though you can fake the products of both.
> > > >
> > > > I know we're not really arguing two distant positions, so I don't
> > > > mean
> > to
> > > be
> > > > picking at nits.
> > > > None-the-less, I think the paedo position completely deflates once
> > > > you realize baptism is not the new sign, and I think the scripture
> > > > supports
> > it
> > > > not being the sign, but the product of the sign.
> > > >
> > > > Grace brother.
> > > > Thanks for your responses.
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chad Richard Bresson [mailto:breusswane@...]
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:06 AM
> > > > To: soundofgrace@...
> > > > Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Steve Fuchs (on MSN)" <SteveF_MS@...>
> > > > To: <soundofgrace@...>
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:42 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [soundofgrace] Covenant theology and baptism
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > But I still think baptism is not the sign, and there's a certain
> > > > > level of distinction between the two, though not necessarily as
> > > > > much distance as traditionally thought in baptistic circles.
> > > > >
> > > > > In part because flesh circumcision carried with it evidence of
> > > > > it's happening.
> > > >
> > > > Baptism is the first "evidence of it's happening".  Support for
> > > > viewing
> > it
> > > > this way is the pattern in Acts: repent and be baptized.
> > > > Separating the
> > > two
> > > > goes beyond what the apostles did.
> > > >
> > > > > Likewise, heart circumcision carries evidence of it's
> > > > > occurrence.
> > > >
> > > > And that evidence is first seen (repent and be baptized) in
> > > > baptism.
> > > >
> > > > >When a
> > > > > person is truly circumcised of the heart, there's fruit that is
> > > > >evidence
> > > > of
> > > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > Precisely.  And baptism is the first fruit that is evidence of the
> > > > circumcision of the heart.
> > > >
> > > > >The heart changes, and it shows.
> > > >
> > > > It shows itself first and foremost, biblically, in baptism.
> > > >
> > > > > Baptism does not have that.  Baptism (the ceremony) is not
> > > > > evidence of the change.
> > > >
> > > > This is where I think your thoughts conflict with the biblical
> > > > record.
> > > Look
> > > > up baptizo, cleansing, water, washing, etc. in the New Covenant
> > > > and it
> > is
> > > > almost always analogous to baptism at some point.
> > > >
> > > > Chad Bresson
> > > > Xenia, OH
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Read the Sound of Grace pages at http://www.soundofgrace.com
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> > > soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> > > >
> > > > To view our online archive go to our web page at
> > > > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Read the Sound of Grace pages at http://www.soundofgrace.com
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> > > soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> > > >
> > > > To view our online archive go to our web page at
> > > > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Read the Sound of Grace pages at http://www.soundofgrace.com
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> > soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> > >
> > > To view our online archive go to our web page at
> > > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> > http://www.soundofgrace.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> >
> > To view our online archive go to our web page at
> > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> >
> > --
> > Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> > http://www.soundofgrace.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> >
> > To view our online archive go to our web page at
> > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> >
> >
>
> --
> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> http://www.soundofgrace.com
>
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
>
> To view our online archive go to our web page at
> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
>
> --
> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> http://www.soundofgrace.com
>
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
>
> To view our online archive go to our web page at
> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
>
>