[soundofgrace] Re: [soundofgrace] inferred deeper meanings

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : December 2004 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: ic2@...
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:58:31 +0000
Joe,

  I got it by reading fast and appreciated it. Chad's post as well. Of course I had to read Chad's post a tad faster.

   Moe


> Dear Chad,
> 
> Just a thought regarding the quote below:
> 
> A couple of weeks ago I read a paper on Dispensationalism written by the one 
> of my early theology professors, Dr. John Master, now a professor at PBU. 
> At any rate, he was trying to predict the next step in the developement of 
> dispensational theology.  Part of his argument concerned what I would call a 
> pan-hermeneutic, i.e and over-riding principle or telos of Scripures and 
> history, to wit, redmeption.  (I cannot recall if he out it in so many 
> words, I just recall that I thought he was setting that forth.  I also 
> remember my history professor (You likely remember Dr. McGoldrick) saying 
> that history was redemptive.
> 
> However, as I considered that, it occured to me that redemption is not the 
> over-arching hermeneutical principle of scripture and history.  Rather, all 
> things are to be interpreted in the light of the God's glorification of 
> Himself in His Son the Lord Jesus.  Redemption is subservient to that goal, 
> as are all other things.
> 
> This serves to enhance your point that eschatolgy precedes soteriology, for 
> it does preced soteriology as a motivating principle in the decrees of God. 
> The fulfillment of that goal (God self-glorification) IS eschatology, in 
> fact, it would be good if all eschatological statements were tested and 
> framed teleologically: that is, how does my view of things to come conform 
> to the ultimate glorification of God in Jesus Christ.
> 
> Sadly, most eschatological systems have little to do with Christ and his 
> glory.  They have more to do with setting dates or ordering events or 
> describing future creation.
> 
> At any rate, I think we will understand history and Scriptures better if we 
> keep that telos in mind.
> 
> BTW, one way in which this telos has been acheived in the fullness of the 
> gospel is the way in which Jesus fulfills all the mediatorial offices of 
> messiah: He is more than just the prohet, priest and king of his people:  He 
> is prophet, AND the message; Priest AND the sacrifice, King AND law.  All 
> things, indeed, have joined in him.  He is the perfection of God;s purpose.
> 
> I know this is a bit rambling, but I'm writing fast!
> 
> Joe T
> 
> BTW, if you want to read the papaer by Master, it can be found at:
> 
> http://www.etsjets.org/meetings/2002/future-of.PDF
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chad Richard Bresson" <breusswane@...>
> To: <soundofgrace@...>
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] inferred deeper meanings
> 
> 
> 
> > Redemption is the central thought/reason for revelation. 
> 
> --
> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> http://www.soundofgrace.com
> 
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
> 
> To view our online archive go to our web page at
> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> 
> 
>