----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph R. Terrell" <pastor@...>
>all he meant was that at that point in his argument, there must
> be some other rest for the people of God that he had not yet mentioned, to
> wit, Christ and faith in Him.

Precisely.  Which is why the most consistent reading of Hebrews presumes an
unbreakable covenant.  CTers tend to run to Hebrews to make their point
about a breakable covenant, then go silent when "the future is now -
since/now" template is placed over the whole of the book.

> What's NPP?

New Perspective on Paul

> Too bad you missed McGoldrick.  He is the only man I know who could speak
> extemporaneously with the accuracy of a formal paper.  And he was and is a
> truly gracious grace believer.

I heard his finals were excruciating. :-)  A close friend of mine broke both
of his arms just before finals week and was able to take a rare McGoldrick
oral.  :-)  He was an elder at an NCT friendly church in the Dayton area
before retiring to the very decaloguian/almost theonomic Greenville
Theological Seminary. :-)

Chad