Just a nit from an oft accused perfectionist:
III. The “Scriptures ...are referring to the OTS ...
and
IV. The 39 books written before Christ (Genesis to Malachi - we will call
these 39 books the “Old Testament Scriptures.”) ...the 27 books written
after Christ (which we will call the “New Testament Scriptures.”)
seems to conflict with:
V. We total reject calling the 39 books written before Christ “the Old
Testament” and likewise reject calling the 27 books written after Christ
“the New Testament.” Using these labels to divide up our Bibles has caused
no end of confusion.
or do you distinguish meaningfully between the labels 'Old Testament' and
'Old Testament Scriptures'?
in grace brother,
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Reisinger" <24jreisinger26@...>
To: <soundofgrace@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:02 PM
Subject: [soundofgrace] A start on NCT distinctives.
This is "off the top of my head." It is meant only as start to stimulate
thinking. and comment. JGR
I. The Bible, all 66 books. are equally inspired by God. II Tim. 3:15.
II. All 66 books of the Bible are profitable and authoritative for
“teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteous.” II Tim. 3:15
III. The “Scriptures which Timothy learned (II Tim. 3:15) and which are
both inspired by God and therefore profitable and authoritative for
“teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteous” are referring to
the OTS in Paul’s admonition in II Tim. 3:15-17. It is these Scriptures that
Paul said could “equip the man of God for every good work” (II Tim 3:17).
IV. The 39 books written before Christ (Genesis to Malachi - we will call
these 39 books the “Old Testament Scriptures.”) are just as must the
authoritative Word of God for the Christian today as they were for the
Israelite. Those 39 books are a vital part of the rule of life for a
Christian today. However, the OTS must be understood and interpreted through
the lens of the 27 books written after Christ (which we will call the “New
Testament Scriptures.”)
V. We total reject calling the 39 books written before Christ “the Old
Testament” and likewise reject calling the 27 books written after Christ
“the New Testament.” Using these labels to divide up our Bibles has caused
no end of confusion.
1. We clearly distinguish, and seek to maintain in our
teaching, the real and distinct difference between the phrase “Old
Testament” and “Old Covenant.” The phrase “Old Testament,” when used to
refer to the 39 books of the Bible written before Christ is purely a
literally division without any Scriptural authority. The phrase “Old
Covenant” is a Biblical term and should be used exclusively for the “Old
Covenant” that God made with Israel at Mount Sinai. The “Old Testament
Scriptures” have a historical beginning but no historical end. They will
remain forever a part of the inspired Word of God. The “Old Covenant” also
has a historical beginning, at Mount Sinai, and it also had an historical
end, at the coming of Christ. The New Covenant that Christ established
replaces, in its totality, the Old Covenant.”
2. Likewise we insist that we do the same thing with the phrase
“New Testament Scriptures” and “New Covenant.” The New Testament Scriptures,
the 27 books of the Bible written after Christ came, do not replace the Old
Testament Scriptures; they are added to the 39 books and become part of our
one equally inspired Bible. On the other hand, the “New Covenant” totally
replaces and does away with the “Old Covenant.”
3. When NCT insists that the “Old Covenant” in its entirety has
been done away, we do not mean the “Old Testament Scriptures” have been done
away in any sense whatever. Not one single verse in the entire Old Testament
Scriptures has been done away even though the Old Covenant” in its entirety
has been done away.
VI. The center of the Bible and the key to understanding its message and
its unity is the Person and Work of the Lord Jesus Christ. Covenants and
Dispensations are important and understanding them both are essential to
understanding the message of the Bible but the redemptive work of Christ as
planned, purposed and brought about by God’s sovereign providence is the key
to the Bible. The Bible is a HIM-book.
See Heb. 10:5 and Luke 24.
VII. The bulk of the Bible is built around two major covenants. They are
described in Scripture as the “Old and New Covenants.” See Gal. 4:24-26.
Jer. 31:31-34 cf. Heb. 8:6-10; 10:15,16.
VIII. Both of these covenants are clearly identified in Scripture as the
covenant made with Israel at Sinai and the New Covenant in Christ that
replaces the Old Covenant made with Israel at Sinai. See Gal 4:24-26 and
Heb. 8:6-13.
IX. Exactly what is “the Old Covenant”? When, and with whom, was it made?
What are its specific terms? Why was it so essential that the Old Covenant
must be done away and replaced with the New Covenant? These questions will
be answered in detail later. We are only concerned with an outline at this
point.
(1) The basic summary document of the Old Covenant was the
“Tablets of the Covenant” or Ten Commandments given to Israel at Sinai as
the terms of their national covenant relationship with God.. See Exodus
34:27-29; Deut. 5:1-4; 9:9-11. This is why the box that was built for the
express purpose of housing the stone tablets containing the Ten Commandments
is called the “Ark of the Covenant,” it housed the summary document of the
covenant or Tablets of the Covenant. See Deut: 9:9-11. For a detailed study
of the place and function of the Ten Commandments in Scripture see our book,
“The Tablets of Stone & the History of Redemption.”
(2) “The Book of the Covenant”was added and made a part of
the Old Covenant. See Exodus 24:6-8. This book was laid along side of the
Ark of the Covenant (Deut. 31:26).At different times in history the Book of
Law was revised. The Tablets of the Covenant was never changed. In actual
fact, the Tablets of the Covenant, or Ten Commandments, were only seen by
human eyes one time after being put in that box and that one look cost
50,070 lives (1 Sam. 6:19). Paul calls the Book of the Covenant “the Book of
the Law” in Gal. 3:10.
(3) Finally the entire system of laws and ceremonies became
part of the”Old Covenant.” See Jer. 34:13,14 and 2 Kings 23:21 for proof
that the so-called ceremonial law was considered part of the Old Covenant.1
The Old Covenant equals Judaism. The phrase “the Law of Moses” is synonymous
the “Old Covenant.”
One of the basic problems New Covenant Theology must deal
with concerns the relationship of the Old to the New. Notice I did not say
what “Old” and “New” I was talking about. That fact is part of the real
problem that we face. If I am asking what the relationship is between the
Old and New Covenants that is one thing. If I am asking what is the
relationship between the Old and New Testaments I asking an entirely
different question. If I am asking what is the relationship between the Old
Covenant and the New Testament then I am really confusing the issue.
The problem we are discussing is called “Continuity versus
Discontinuity.” What part of the Old is brought over into the New and what
is fulfilled and done away? Again, the question is confusing and impossible
to answer until we ask and answer “What specific old and new thing are you
talking about?” My answer will make some people angry and others will quit
reading and say, “Reisinger’s simplistic answer shows that he does not
understand how complex the problem is.” In my defense, let me say that I do
understand how complex the question is if the questions are framed within
current systematic theologies. However, the complexity grows out of not
carefully defining exactly what we talking about. That requires carefully
defining the terms we are using.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 At one point I held that the Old Covenant and the Ten Commandments were
one on one the same thing. I changed my mind and now hold to the above. My
detailed reasons for changning are set forth in my book “Tablets of Stone.”
--
Read the Sound of Grace pages at
http://www.soundofgrace.com
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
To view our online archive go to our web page at
http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace