How are the commandments not pre-? The ratification is in chapter 24. The flow of the narrative is that the ratification of chapter 24 happens *after* God speaks the 10 commandments to Moses. Pastor Chad Richard Bresson Clearcreek Chapel Springboro, OH http://breusswane.blogspot.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark LaCour" <mark_lacour@...> To: <soundofgrace@...> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 11:12 PM Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Psalm 119 >I think we're on the same page. But Exodus 21-23 is post-ratification, not >pre, since the Ten Commandments are mentioned first in chapter 20. > > Mark > > Chad Richard Bresson <breusswane@...> wrote: > >Would you say then that the giving of the Ten Commandments event in >>specific is the ratification of the Old Covenant? > > As Hebrews treats "the Old Covenant", yes, absolutely. In fact, don't hear > me to say that the Ten Commandments event isn't THE significant > covenant/law > event of the Old Testament. It is. My only point was to suggest that the > ratification is inclusive of the 613. > > My qualification of the above is that I'm not ready to suggest that > Hebrews' > specific use of "Old Covenant" as the Mosaic Covenant extends to all uses > of > "Old Covenant". i.e. I think there are times when it is possible to speak > of > the New Covenant over against the Old Testament as Old Covenant, esp. as > it > relates to the question "*what* did Christ fulfill?". > >>the giving of the Sinatic law is pre-ratification? > > Exodus 20-23 would be pre-ratification, would it not? > > Pastor Chad Richard Bresson > Clearcreek Chapel > Springboro, OH > http://breusswane.blogspot.com/ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark LaCour" > To: > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 10:02 PM > Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Psalm 119 > > >> Couldn't agree more. Would you say then that the giving of the Ten >> Commandments event in specific is the ratification of the Old Covenant? >> And just for clarity since you brought it up, could you elaborate on how >> the giving of the Sinatic law is pre-ratification? I understand how it's >> post-ratification. Thanks again. >> >> Mark LaCour >> >> >> >> Chad Richard Bresson > wrote: >> Ratification isn't both event and continuum. Ratification is event. The >> giving of the Sinatic law is pre and post ratification... it does nothing >> to >> nullify the ratification. >> >> Pastor Chad Richard Bresson >> Clearcreek Chapel >> Springboro, OH >> http://breusswane.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> -- >> Read the Sound of Grace pages at >> http://www.soundofgrace.com >> >> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: >> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@... >> >> To view our online archive go to our web page at >> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Yahoo! Shopping >> Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping >> -- >> Read the Sound of Grace pages at >> http://www.soundofgrace.com >> >> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: >> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@... >> >> To view our online archive go to our web page at >> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace >> > > > -- > Read the Sound of Grace pages at > http://www.soundofgrace.com > > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: > soundofgrace-unsubscribe@... > > To view our online archive go to our web page at > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Shopping > Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping > -- > Read the Sound of Grace pages at > http://www.soundofgrace.com > > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: > soundofgrace-unsubscribe@... > > To view our online archive go to our web page at > http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace >