Dear Sounders,

Question one-
If you are convinced that the opposite of a literal meaning is a "spiritual" meaning how would you explain symbolic?

Question Two-
"How" and or "When" do you know to spiritualize the text?

Question Three-
Should a hermeneutical technique follow typologies or transformisms?

Question Four-
Why were 99.9% of all Covenant theologians A-millennialists?

It is debatable which is more irresponsible; changing the truth of Scripture into the errors of tradition, or preaching truth from the wrong passages.  

Question Five-
If the rule of "literal when possible" isn't adhered to rigidly, how can there be grounds for assuming that the literal sense is the primary meaning in *any* context?

Consistency in continuing reform, my friends.  Doug
--
Read the Sound of Grace pages at
http://www.soundofgrace.com

To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...

To view our online archive go to our web page at
http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace