[soundofgrace] Re: [soundofgrace] Church Service

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : February 2006 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Chad Richard Bresson" <breusswane@...>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:13:19 -0500
And I should add... the import of 1 Tim. 2:12 is *not* that a woman is to 
teach.  That much is true.  The import is *why* she isn't to teach... she is 
to have no authority over the man.  What I find remarkable in this 
conversation is that inherent to the egalitarian argument there is presumed 
to be no authority invested in the public reading of scripture.

That's a false dichotomy between spoken and preached Word.  There *is* an 
authority that is inherent to the public administration of the Word, 
whatever form it takes, in the worship service.

Pastor Chad Richard Bresson
Clearcreek Chapel
Springboro, OH
http://breusswane.blogspot.com




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Fuchs" <SteveF_MS@...>
To: <soundofgrace@...>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Church Service


> Chad,
>
> Can you show us where 'gifted' = 'qualified' in the text?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chad Richard Bresson" <breusswane@...>
> To: <soundofgrace@...>
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [soundofgrace] Church Service
>
>
>>Are we not all ministers of the gospel?
>
> No.  Witnesses to the gospel?  Yes.  Entrusted with the gospel?  No.
>
> Like it or not, the scriptures *do* reflect differences in function,
> responsibility, and relationship.  The text does reflect hierarchy.  It's
> why some are *qualified* and some are not. Those qualifications reflect
> hierarchy of relationship to the entrustment.
>
> --
> Pastor Chad Richard Bresson
> Clearcreek Chapel
> Springboro, OH
> http://breusswane.blogspot.com
>
> On 2/27/06, H Dorrington <hjdinfl@...> wrote:
>>
>> I think both Terry and Moe make excellent points.  One of the problems
>> with the church today is that we pay someone else to do everything for 
>> us.
>> We pay the elders to do the teaching and we pay the missionaries to do 
>> the
>> witnessing and we then believe that we are doing all we can for the Lord 
>> and
>> we are proud of it.  Are we not all ministers of the gospel?
>>
>> Harry
>>
>> Terry Rayburn <terryrayburn@...> wrote:
>> Don't beat around the bush, Moe, what do you
>> really think? :)
>>
>> Seriously, I would consider banning women from
>> reading the Bible in a church assembly as
>> equivalent to the Pharisees under the Old Covenant
>> outlawing a needle carried in a lady's apron.
>>
>> They were expressing an actual God-given scriptural principle
>> of that time and place, (namely, no work on the Sabbath),
>> but they were going beyond the scripture to their own
>> extra-biblical application of that principle.
>>
>> That Pharasaic principle was this: better to err on the side
>> of extra-strict adherance than to even allow the *possibility*
>> of a violation.
>>
>> Godly Pharisees (yes, there were such) did so out of a
>> true reverance for the Lord, ungodly Pharisees, of whom
>> there were many, did it out of pure self-righteousness.
>>
>> But even that Pharasaic principle was beyond
>> scripture, and thus a sort of self-fulfilling principle.
>>
>> While still despising sin and loving the precepts of the
>> Lord in our hearts, yet we need to avoid over-exegeting
>> some passages.
>>
>> A good test sometimes is to ask the question, "Should
>> someone be disciplined vis a vis Matt. 18, and put out
>> of the assembly for unrepentedly doing that?"
>>
>> Terry Rayburn
>>
>> Moe Bergeron wrote:
>> Now brethren, I suspect some of you are control freaks and are guilty of 
>> a
>> Gentile system of rule. You would have only the "duly authorized"
>> distributing the elements or bringing a word of encouragement,etc.,. The
>> end
>> result is a bunch of spectators sitting beneath your chief seats.
>>
>> I have said it before and I will say it again. Pastors emasculate more 
>> men
>> than all of the women libbers out there.
>>
>> Retreating quickly,
>> moe
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Yahoo! Mail
>> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>> --
>> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
>> http://www.soundofgrace.com
>>
>> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
>> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
>>
>> To view our online archive go to our web page at
>> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> http://www.soundofgrace.com
>
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: 
> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
>
> To view our online archive go to our web page at
> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
> --
> Read the Sound of Grace pages at
> http://www.soundofgrace.com
>
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: 
> soundofgrace-unsubscribe@...
>
> To view our online archive go to our web page at
> http://www.associate.com/groups/soundofgrace
>
>
>