[Moe had written>>
{Here's some plain English for one and all. There is no need to run for the early manuscripts to understand what is being said by this moderator. The "KJV Only" debate is for those other lists who were dumb enough to take the first bite. We will not entertain the KJV ONLY controversy on this list.  Salvation is by grace.    Subscription on our list is also by grace.    Moe]

Hey Moe,
  You let Kostas and I go for weeks discussing historic backgrounds and Greek references.  It was good study, and a loving discourse.  It ended on my part basically when I asked for a shred of historic evidence for a recension either 250 or 350 AD, and got silence from all.  There are some Jude type Bible issues here that ought to be contended for.  We are not as many that corrupt the word of God.  Mark and avoid those that that cause offenses contrary to Bible doctrine.  What part hath he that believeth with an infidel?  It goes on.  I'd appeal for truth, which may not be the party line at times.
To me it is a sovereignty of God and a little leaven issue.  It seems hard for me to think we are not free to discuss such, but there are so many straw men, arminian fluff and engrained paradigms that I can almost see your point.  My dad had a saying in his tire shop when I was a kid.  The boss ain't always right, but the boss is always the boss.
Your humble servant, Tim  

Ec 9:16  Then said I, Wisdom is better than strength: nevertheless the poor man’s wisdom is despised, and his words are not heard.