[futurebasic] Re: [FB] Does size matter?

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : October 1999 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: MacMuse@...
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 20:40:05 EDT
In a message dated 10/14/99 10:02:45 AM, Chris.Young@... writes:

<< My feeling would be the 13" 640 x 480 resolution/size as the minimum. I 
think that all Macs other than the original and SEs support at least 
that (Mac II 12" B&W monitors, original 13" RGB, etc.).

Chris Young >>

<<But ask yourself the key question. Will I make more money with more 
variations.
If the answer's no, QED. If the answer's yes, you've answered your own 
question.

Phil.>>

The 12"  monitors which came with the LC series are only 512 x 384 
resolution. If you expect to sell your product to schools (as I do) I can 
tell you from experience that designing to allow for at least the LC 12" 
screen and ideally the SE 9" screen will help your sales. You wouldn't 
believe how many of them are still pulling duty in cash strapped schools. 
Of course, in many school districts (mine included), computers purchased in 
the last couple of years are PeeCee's because quote: (circa 1997) "Apple is 
going under..."
Then I hear less computer knowledgable teachers say "I love the PC's, Apples 
just can't do as many things." Yea, if you're comparing 68000's to Pentium 
III's.  Arrrggghhh!

Climbing off soap box...
Roger Clary