[futurebasic] Re: [FB] CFDynamic

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : January 2008 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Jay Reeve <jayreeve@...>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:59:59 -0600
On Jan 27, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Brian Stevens wrote:

>>  Specifically text and style handles or the FB get field handle  
>> that combines the style and text into a single bundle?
> Are you avoiding FB's dynamic arrays because of the comment in the  
> FB Reference that  says "Dynamic arrays may not be used to  
> dimension an array of handles"?  Don't blame you for that. It is a  
> clear message. However,  I've used FB's dynamic array to store  
> allocated (i.e. NewPtr) pointers (record array )  with absolutely  
> no issues. I haven't tried storing handles with OS X.  Since I  
> haven't looked at the dynamic array code in many months, I could be  
> all wet here, but something tells me that the comment in the  
> reference manual is either outdated or applies to a specific use.   
> FBtoC implementation of dynamic arrays is different from FB's but I  
> don't believe it would prevent you from storing handles. It is FB's  
> implementation I haven't reviewed in a while.

That caveat in the Dynamic docs, while necessary, has caused more  
confusion than a congressional committee. What it refers to has  
nothing to do with the ability to store a handle in a dynamic array  
(it's just a 4-byte integer, so of course you can), but the ability  
of FB to treat the array element as a handle. In old FB, there were  
certain things you could do with handle arrays, to get direct access  
to the data in the handle block. I tried to recreate this for a demo,  
but failed. The point of the caveat, though, was that you could never  
do that with a dynamic array.

You can certainly store handles in FB dynamic arrays, but you'll need  
to either transfer them into separate handle vars for use, or  
manually dereference them. I can't think of any reason the same  
wouldn't be true in FBtoC.

   =J= a  y